COBB STORAGE FIELD STATION 017
BUTTE, MT · SILVER BOW COUNTY · NAICS 486210
Data updated May 2026
COBB STORAGE FIELD STATION 017 ranks among smaller GHGRP totals (#7,982 of 8,713 nationally; #35 of 43 in MT), a lower-footprint comparator in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems.
- National rank #7,982 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #35 of 43 in MT
- #1,930 of 2,099 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- -57.4% since 2011
COBB STORAGE FIELD STATION 017 vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
5,498 7982nd of 8713 higher than 731 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2012
Facility footprint context
Inside the EPA Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector it ranks #1,930 of 2,099 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
Emissions decline across reporting years
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2012 | 5,498 |
| 2011 | 12,899 |
Facility insight: COBB STORAGE FIELD STATION 017
COBB STORAGE FIELD STATION 017 (ID 1002980) reported 5K MT CO₂e for 2012 in SILVER BOW COUNTY, MT (#7,982 of 8,713 by latest CO₂e).
Across 2011–2012, annual CO₂e fell 57.4%; peak load was 13K MT in 2011. This facility has filed every year from 2011 to 2012, a complete 2-year record.
Peak year was 2011 at 13K MT CO2e; latest 2012 sits 57.4% below that peak (5K MT). The largest year-to-year move was 2011→2012 (-57.4%, 7K MT).
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does COBB STORAGE FIELD STATION 017 rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, COBB STORAGE FIELD STATION 017 ranks #7,982 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #35 of 43 facilities in MT (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than COBB STORAGE FIELD STATION 017? ▼
COBB STORAGE FIELD STATION 017's 5K MT CO₂e is higher than 731 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (8%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does COBB STORAGE FIELD STATION 017 emit? ▼
COBB STORAGE FIELD STATION 017 reported 5K MT CO2e in 2012.
Where does COBB STORAGE FIELD STATION 017 rank inside Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems, COBB STORAGE FIELD STATION 017 ranks #1,930 of 2,099 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is COBB STORAGE FIELD STATION 017 reducing emissions? ▼
Over 2 reporting years (2011–2012), COBB STORAGE FIELD STATION 017's emissions have decreased by 57.4%. This suggests meaningful progress in emissions reduction.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Lower-footprint peers outside MT: nearest CO₂e totals and same-sector reporters for context.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside MT (5K MT here).
Similar Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside MT.