Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2
WOLF POINT, MT · ROOSEVELT COUNTY · NAICS 486210
Last reported 2016. This facility's newest EPA GHGRP report is for 2016, not 2023, so its figures and its rank compare older data with 2023 peers. The ranking tables mark facilities like this one with a "Last reported" label.
Data updated May 2026
Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2 ranks among smaller GHGRP totals (#8,455 of 8,713 nationally; #40 of 43 in MT), a lower-footprint comparator in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems.
- National rank #8,455 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #40 of 43 in MT
- #2,059 of 2,099 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- -97.8% since 2011
Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2 vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
946 8455th of 8713 higher than 258 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2016
Facility footprint context
Inside the EPA Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector it ranks #2,059 of 2,099 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
Emissions decline across reporting years
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 946 |
| 2015 | 1,146 |
| 2014 | 13,629 |
| 2013 | 66,193 |
| 2012 | 56,715 |
| 2011 | 43,350 |
Facility insight: Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2
Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2 (ID 1004785) reported 946 MT CO₂e for 2016 in ROOSEVELT COUNTY, MT (#8,455 of 8,713 by latest CO₂e).
Across 2011–2016, annual CO₂e fell 97.8%; peak load was 66K MT in 2013. This facility has filed every year from 2011 to 2016, a complete 6-year record.
Peak year was 2013 at 66K MT CO2e; latest 2016 sits 98.6% below that peak (946 MT). The largest year-to-year move was 2013→2014 (-79.4%, 53K MT).
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2 rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2 ranks #8,455 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #40 of 43 facilities in MT (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2? ▼
Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2's 946 MT CO₂e is higher than 258 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (3%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2 emit? ▼
Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2 reported 946 MT CO2e in 2016.
Where does Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2 rank inside Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems, Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2 ranks #2,059 of 2,099 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2 reducing emissions? ▼
Over 6 reporting years (2011–2016), Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2's emissions have decreased by 97.8%. This suggests meaningful progress in emissions reduction.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Lower-footprint peers outside MT: nearest CO₂e totals and same-sector reporters for context.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside MT (946 MT here).
Similar Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside MT.