Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2
WOLF POINT, MT · ROOSEVELT COUNTY · NAICS 486210
Data updated May 2026
Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2 ranks among smaller GHGRP totals (#8,455 of 8,713 nationally; #40 of 43 in MT), a lower-footprint comparator in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems.
- National rank #8,455 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #40 of 43 in MT
- #2,059 of 2,099 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- -97.8% since 2011
Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2 vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
946 8455th of 8713 higher than 258 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2016
Facility footprint context
Inside the EPA Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector it ranks #2,059 of 2,099 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
Emissions decline across reporting years
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 946 |
| 2015 | 1,146 |
| 2014 | 13,629 |
| 2013 | 66,193 |
| 2012 | 56,715 |
| 2011 | 43,350 |
Facility insight: Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2
Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2 (ID 1004785) reported 946 MT CO₂e for 2016 in ROOSEVELT COUNTY, MT (#8,455 of 8,713 by latest CO₂e).
Across 2011–2016, annual CO₂e fell 97.8%; peak load was 66K MT in 2013. This facility has filed every year from 2011 to 2016, a complete 6-year record.
Peak year was 2013 at 66K MT CO2e; latest 2016 sits 98.6% below that peak (946 MT). The largest year-to-year move was 2013→2014 (-79.4%, 53K MT).
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2 rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2 ranks #8,455 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #40 of 43 facilities in MT (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2? ▼
Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2's 946 MT CO₂e is higher than 258 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (3%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2 emit? ▼
Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2 reported 946 MT CO2e in 2016.
Where does Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2 rank inside Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems, Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2 ranks #2,059 of 2,099 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2 reducing emissions? ▼
Over 6 reporting years (2011–2016), Northern Border Pipeline Wolf Point CS#2's emissions have decreased by 97.8%. This suggests meaningful progress in emissions reduction.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Lower-footprint peers outside MT: nearest CO₂e totals and same-sector reporters for context.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside MT (946 MT here).
Similar Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside MT.