Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3
CULBERTSON, MT · ROOSEVELT COUNTY · NAICS 486210
Data updated May 2026
Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3 ranks among smaller GHGRP totals (#8,477 of 8,713 nationally; #41 of 43 in MT), a lower-footprint comparator in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems.
- National rank #8,477 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #41 of 43 in MT
- #2,063 of 2,099 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- -99.2% since 2011
Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3 vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
805 8477th of 8713 higher than 236 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2021
Facility footprint context
Inside the EPA Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector it ranks #2,063 of 2,099 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
Emissions decline across reporting years
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 805 |
| 2020 | 1,672 |
| 2019 | 2,136 |
| 2018 | 20,839 |
| 2017 | 81,164 |
| 2016 | 94,983 |
| 2015 | 80,344 |
| 2014 | 72,030 |
| 2013 | 100,960 |
| 2012 | 103,429 |
| 2011 | 95,969 |
Facility insight: Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3
Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3 (ID 1005957) reported 805 MT CO₂e for 2021 in ROOSEVELT COUNTY, MT (#8,477 of 8,713 by latest CO₂e).
Across 2011–2021, annual CO₂e fell 99.2%; peak load was 103K MT in 2012. This facility has filed every year from 2011 to 2021, a complete 11-year record.
Peak year was 2012 at 103K MT CO2e; latest 2021 sits 99.2% below that peak (805 MT). The largest year-to-year move was 2017→2018 (-74.3%, 60K MT).
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3 rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3 ranks #8,477 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #41 of 43 facilities in MT (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3? ▼
Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3's 805 MT CO₂e is higher than 236 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (3%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3 emit? ▼
Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3 reported 805 MT CO2e in 2021.
Where does Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3 rank inside Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems, Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3 ranks #2,063 of 2,099 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3 reducing emissions? ▼
Over 11 reporting years (2011–2021), Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3's emissions have decreased by 99.2%. This suggests meaningful progress in emissions reduction.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Lower-footprint peers outside MT: nearest CO₂e totals and same-sector reporters for context.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside MT (805 MT here).
Similar Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside MT.