Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3
CULBERTSON, MT · ROOSEVELT COUNTY · NAICS 486210
Last reported 2021. This facility's newest EPA GHGRP report is for 2021, not 2023, so its figures and its rank compare older data with 2023 peers. The ranking tables mark facilities like this one with a "Last reported" label.
Data updated May 2026
Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3 ranks among smaller GHGRP totals (#8,477 of 8,713 nationally; #41 of 43 in MT), a lower-footprint comparator in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems.
- National rank #8,477 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #41 of 43 in MT
- #2,063 of 2,099 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- -99.2% since 2011
Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3 vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
805 8477th of 8713 higher than 236 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2021
Facility footprint context
Inside the EPA Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector it ranks #2,063 of 2,099 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
Emissions decline across reporting years
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 805 |
| 2020 | 1,672 |
| 2019 | 2,136 |
| 2018 | 20,839 |
| 2017 | 81,164 |
| 2016 | 94,983 |
| 2015 | 80,344 |
| 2014 | 72,030 |
| 2013 | 100,960 |
| 2012 | 103,429 |
| 2011 | 95,969 |
Facility insight: Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3
Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3 (ID 1005957) reported 805 MT CO₂e for 2021 in ROOSEVELT COUNTY, MT (#8,477 of 8,713 by latest CO₂e).
Across 2011–2021, annual CO₂e fell 99.2%; peak load was 103K MT in 2012. This facility has filed every year from 2011 to 2021, a complete 11-year record.
Peak year was 2012 at 103K MT CO2e; latest 2021 sits 99.2% below that peak (805 MT). The largest year-to-year move was 2017→2018 (-74.3%, 60K MT).
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3 rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3 ranks #8,477 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #41 of 43 facilities in MT (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3? ▼
Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3's 805 MT CO₂e is higher than 236 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (3%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3 emit? ▼
Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3 reported 805 MT CO2e in 2021.
Where does Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3 rank inside Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems, Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3 ranks #2,063 of 2,099 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3 reducing emissions? ▼
Over 11 reporting years (2011–2021), Northern Border Pipeline Culbertson CS#3's emissions have decreased by 99.2%. This suggests meaningful progress in emissions reduction.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Lower-footprint peers outside MT: nearest CO₂e totals and same-sector reporters for context.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside MT (805 MT here).
Similar Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside MT.