Buckeye Port Reading Terminal
PT. READING, NJ · MIDDLESEX COUNTY · NAICS 493190
Data updated May 2026
Buckeye Port Reading Terminal ranks among smaller GHGRP totals (#8,024 of 8,713 nationally; #97 of 120 in NJ), a lower-footprint comparator in Other.
- National rank #8,024 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #97 of 120 in NJ
- #1,502 of 1,599 in Other
- -99.1% since 2011
Buckeye Port Reading Terminal vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
5,109 8024th of 8713 higher than 689 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2014
Facility footprint context
Inside the EPA Other sector it ranks #1,502 of 1,599 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
Emissions decline across reporting years
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 5,109 |
| 2013 | 92,597 |
| 2012 | 514,556 |
| 2011 | 598,055 |
Facility insight: Buckeye Port Reading Terminal
Buckeye Port Reading Terminal (ID 1007595) reported 5K MT CO₂e for 2014 in MIDDLESEX COUNTY, NJ (#8,024 of 8,713 by latest CO₂e).
Across 2011–2014, annual CO₂e fell 99.1%; peak load was 598K MT in 2011. This facility has filed every year from 2011 to 2014, a complete 4-year record.
Peak year was 2011 at 598K MT CO2e; latest 2014 sits 99.1% below that peak (5K MT). The largest year-to-year move was 2012→2013 (-82.0%, 422K MT).
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does Buckeye Port Reading Terminal rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, Buckeye Port Reading Terminal ranks #8,024 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #97 of 120 facilities in NJ (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than Buckeye Port Reading Terminal? ▼
Buckeye Port Reading Terminal's 5K MT CO₂e is higher than 689 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (8%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does Buckeye Port Reading Terminal emit? ▼
Buckeye Port Reading Terminal reported 5K MT CO2e in 2014.
Where does Buckeye Port Reading Terminal rank inside Other? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Other, Buckeye Port Reading Terminal ranks #1,502 of 1,599 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is Buckeye Port Reading Terminal reducing emissions? ▼
Over 4 reporting years (2011–2014), Buckeye Port Reading Terminal's emissions have decreased by 99.1%. This suggests meaningful progress in emissions reduction.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Lower-footprint peers outside NJ: nearest CO₂e totals and same-sector reporters for context.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside NJ (5K MT here).
Similar Other CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside NJ.