Stuart Plant
Stuart, OK · PITTSBURG COUNTY · NAICS 213112
Data updated May 2026
Stuart Plant ranks among smaller GHGRP totals (#6,992 of 8,713 nationally; #209 of 247 in OK), a lower-footprint comparator in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems.
- National rank #6,992 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #209 of 247 in OK
- #1,612 of 2,099 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- -60.0% since 2013
Stuart Plant vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
16,888 6992nd of 8713 higher than 1,721 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2021
Facility footprint context
Inside the EPA Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector it ranks #1,612 of 2,099 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
Emissions decline across reporting years
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 16,888 |
| 2020 | 17,679 |
| 2019 | 9,222 |
| 2018 | 17,113 |
| 2017 | 17,309 |
| 2016 | 29,279 |
| 2015 | 30,376 |
| 2014 | 31,519 |
| 2013 | 42,223 |
Facility insight: Stuart Plant
Stuart Plant (ID 1009103) reported 17K MT CO₂e for 2021 in PITTSBURG COUNTY, OK (#6,992 of 8,713 by latest CO₂e).
Across 2013–2021, annual CO₂e fell 60.0%; peak load was 42K MT in 2013. This facility has filed every year from 2013 to 2021, a complete 9-year record.
Peak year was 2013 at 42K MT CO2e; latest 2021 sits 60% below that peak (17K MT). The largest year-to-year move was 2016→2017 (-40.9%, 12K MT).
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does Stuart Plant rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, Stuart Plant ranks #6,992 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #209 of 247 facilities in OK (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than Stuart Plant? ▼
Stuart Plant's 17K MT CO₂e is higher than 1,721 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (20%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does Stuart Plant emit? ▼
Stuart Plant reported 17K MT CO2e in 2021.
Where does Stuart Plant rank inside Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems, Stuart Plant ranks #1,612 of 2,099 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is Stuart Plant reducing emissions? ▼
Over 9 reporting years (2013–2021), Stuart Plant's emissions have decreased by 60%. This suggests meaningful progress in emissions reduction.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Lower-footprint peers outside OK: nearest CO₂e totals and same-sector reporters for context.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside OK (17K MT here).
Similar Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside OK.