Puma CPF-1
Heber Springs, AR · CLEBURNE COUNTY · NAICS 213112
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, Puma CPF-1 ranks #4,444 of 8,713 U.S. reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e and #65 of 185 facilities in AR.
- National rank #4,444 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #65 of 185 in AR
- #757 of 2,099 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- +61.5% since 2013
Puma CPF-1 vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
46,626 4444th of 8713 higher than 4,269 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2015
Facility footprint context
Inside the EPA Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector it ranks #757 of 2,099 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
Emissions growth across reporting years
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2015 | 46,626 |
| 2014 | 45,796 |
| 2013 | 28,878 |
Facility insight: Puma CPF-1
Puma CPF-1 (EPA GHGRP Facility ID 1011245) reported 47K metric tons of CO2-equivalent in 2015, operating in Heber Springs, AR within CLEBURNE COUNTY. Among GHGRP reporters it ranks #4,444 of 8,713 nationally by latest CO₂e and #65 of 185 in AR. The site is classified under Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems with NAICS code 213112.
From 2013 to 2015, reported CO₂e rose 61.5% (peak 47K MT). This facility has filed every year from 2013 to 2015, a complete 3-year record.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does Puma CPF-1 rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, Puma CPF-1 ranks #4,444 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #65 of 185 facilities in AR (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than Puma CPF-1? ▼
Puma CPF-1's 47K MT CO₂e is higher than 4,269 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (49%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does Puma CPF-1 emit? ▼
Puma CPF-1 reported 47K MT CO2e in 2015.
Where does Puma CPF-1 rank inside Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems, Puma CPF-1 ranks #757 of 2,099 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is Puma CPF-1 reducing emissions? ▼
Over 3 reporting years (2013–2015), Puma CPF-1's emissions have increased by 61.5%. This may reflect expanded operations or increased production.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Two GHGRP-derived peer sets for Puma CPF-1, both outside AR so the neighborhoods are not state-geo containment.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside AR (47K MT here).
Similar Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside AR.