Puma CPF-1
Heber Springs, AR · CLEBURNE COUNTY · NAICS 213112
Last reported 2015. This facility's newest EPA GHGRP report is for 2015, not 2023, so its figures and its rank compare older data with 2023 peers. The ranking tables mark facilities like this one with a "Last reported" label.
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, Puma CPF-1 ranks #4,444 of 8,713 U.S. reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e and #65 of 185 facilities in AR.
- National rank #4,444 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #65 of 185 in AR
- #757 of 2,099 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- +61.5% since 2013
Puma CPF-1 vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
46,626 4444th of 8713 higher than 4,269 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2015
Facility footprint context
Inside the EPA Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector it ranks #757 of 2,099 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
Emissions growth across reporting years
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2015 | 46,626 |
| 2014 | 45,796 |
| 2013 | 28,878 |
Facility insight: Puma CPF-1
Puma CPF-1 (EPA GHGRP Facility ID 1011245) reported 47K metric tons of CO2-equivalent in 2015, operating in Heber Springs, AR within CLEBURNE COUNTY. Among GHGRP reporters it ranks #4,444 of 8,713 nationally by latest CO₂e and #65 of 185 in AR. The site is classified under Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems with NAICS code 213112.
From 2013 to 2015, reported CO₂e rose 61.5% (peak 47K MT). This facility has filed every year from 2013 to 2015, a complete 3-year record.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does Puma CPF-1 rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, Puma CPF-1 ranks #4,444 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #65 of 185 facilities in AR (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than Puma CPF-1? ▼
Puma CPF-1's 47K MT CO₂e is higher than 4,269 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (49%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does Puma CPF-1 emit? ▼
Puma CPF-1 reported 47K MT CO2e in 2015.
Where does Puma CPF-1 rank inside Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems, Puma CPF-1 ranks #757 of 2,099 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is Puma CPF-1 reducing emissions? ▼
Over 3 reporting years (2013–2015), Puma CPF-1's emissions have increased by 61.5%. This may reflect expanded operations or increased production.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Two GHGRP-derived peer sets for Puma CPF-1, both outside AR so the neighborhoods are not state-geo containment.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside AR (47K MT here).
Similar Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside AR.