White River Compressor Station
Vernal, UT · UINTAH · NAICS 211111
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, White River Compressor Station ranks #5,742 of 8,713 U.S. reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e and #68 of 86 facilities in UT.
- National rank #5,742 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #68 of 86 in UT
- #1,184 of 2,099 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- -17.3% since 2013
White River Compressor Station vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
29,533 5742nd of 8713 higher than 2,971 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2015
Facility footprint context
Inside the EPA Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector it ranks #1,184 of 2,099 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
Emissions decline across reporting years
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2015 | 29,533 |
| 2014 | 28,462 |
| 2013 | 35,723 |
Facility insight: White River Compressor Station
White River Compressor Station (EPA GHGRP Facility ID 1011287) reported 30K metric tons of CO2-equivalent in 2015, operating in Vernal, UT within UINTAH. Among GHGRP reporters it ranks #5,742 of 8,713 nationally by latest CO₂e and #68 of 86 in UT. The site is classified under Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems with NAICS code 211111.
Across 2013–2015, annual CO₂e fell 17.3%; peak load was 36K MT in 2013. This facility has filed every year from 2013 to 2015, a complete 3-year record.
Peak year was 2013 at 36K MT CO2e; latest 2015 sits 17.3% below that peak (30K MT). The largest year-to-year move was 2013→2014 (-20.3%, 7K MT).
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does White River Compressor Station rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, White River Compressor Station ranks #5,742 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #68 of 86 facilities in UT (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than White River Compressor Station? ▼
White River Compressor Station's 30K MT CO₂e is higher than 2,971 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (34%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does White River Compressor Station emit? ▼
White River Compressor Station reported 30K MT CO2e in 2015.
Where does White River Compressor Station rank inside Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems, White River Compressor Station ranks #1,184 of 2,099 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is White River Compressor Station reducing emissions? ▼
Over 3 reporting years (2013–2015), White River Compressor Station's emissions have decreased by 17.3%. This suggests meaningful progress in emissions reduction.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Two GHGRP-derived peer sets for White River Compressor Station, both outside UT so the neighborhoods are not state-geo containment.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside UT (30K MT here).
Similar Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside UT.