EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Alliance Pipeline - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 6 facilities across 4 states (496K MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 496K
- Reporting facilities
- 6
- States covered
- 4
- Overall rank
- #471
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Alliance Pipeline reported 496K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 6 facilities in 4 states (ranks #471 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions remained broadly stable over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #471 of 2,289
- #35 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- +2.8% since 2011
Alliance Pipeline vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
496,482 471st of 2289 higher than 1,818 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Alliance Pipeline spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).
You are here: Alliance Pipeline.
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: Alliance Pipeline, 6 facilities, 0.5M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent alliance-pipeline · 2023 #471 · 496K MT
CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-MULTI · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-FLAT · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 496K MT
- UPPER-Q #471/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Ford Motor · Other
- FAC-PAIR 6 facilities
- SPAN-MULTI 4 states
- SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
- TREND-FLAT +3% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Ford Motor · Other (±1K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.7% of 496K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.3%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.7%
- 495K MT
- CH₄
- 0.3%
- 1K MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 278 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Alliance Pipeline
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Alliance Pipeline - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Alliance Pipeline's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
High-emitter reporting timeline
Alliance Pipeline - high-emitter annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 496K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Alliance Pipeline annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Alliance Pipeline reported 496K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 483K MT in 2011 - a rise of 2.8% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (6)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| ALLIANCE PIPELINE, L.P.-FAIRMOUNT COMPRESSOR STATION Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems FAIRMOUNT, ND | FAIRMOUNT, ND | 91K |
| ALLIANCE PIPELINE, L.P.-WIMBLEDON COMPRESSOR STATION Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems WIMBLEDON, ND | WIMBLEDON, ND | 90K |
| ALLIANCE PIPELINE - OLIVIA 23-A Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems BIRD ISLAND, MN | BIRD ISLAND, MN | 86K |
| Alliance Pipeline L.P. Albert Lea 25-A Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Albert Lea, MN | Albert Lea, MN | 86K |
| ALLIANCE PIPELINE L.P. - MANCHESTER Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems MANCHESTER, IA | MANCHESTER, IA | 83K |
| ALLIANCE PIPELINE LP-Tampico Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems TAMPICO, IL | TAMPICO, IL | 60K |
Where Alliance Pipeline's reported CO₂e sits by state
36.5% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in North Dakota (2 sites) ; next is Minnesota at 34.6% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Alliance Pipeline reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (496K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (496K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (6 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (83K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Alliance Pipeline's emissions profile
- Alliance Pipeline runs mid-intensity per facility (83K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
- It ranks #471 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.