EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Minerals

Cheney Lime & Cement CO - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 1 facility across 1 state (495K MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
495K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#472
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

495K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Cheney Lime & Cement CO reported 495K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #472 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 35% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #472 of 2,289
  • #44 in Minerals
  • +34.5% since 2011

Cheney Lime & Cement CO vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

494,757 472nd of 2289 higher than 1,817 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Cheney Lime & Cement CO spreads its footprint vs Minerals peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Minerals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 3.57M MT).

Median split: 5 facilities, 3.57M MT CO₂e among Minerals peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 051015 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Minerals
Median split: 5 facilities, 3.57M MT CO₂e among Minerals peers.

You are here: Cheney Lime & Cement CO.

Minerals peer footprint table: Cheney Lime & Cement CO, 1 facilities, 0.49M MT CO2e. Holcim Participations (us), 12 facilities, 11.04M MT CO2e. Eagle Materials, 13 facilities, 5.84M MT CO2e. Rc Lonestar, 7 facilities, 5.59M MT CO2e. Lhoist North America, 10 facilities, 5.45M MT CO2e. Cemex, 7 facilities, 5.39M MT CO2e. Crh Americas, 7 facilities, 4.37M MT CO2e. Heidelberg Materials US Cement, 6 facilities, 4.17M MT CO2e. Carmeuse Lime, 10 facilities, 4.13M MT CO2e. Martin Marietta Materials, 4 facilities, 4M MT CO2e. Graymont, 9 facilities, 3.71M MT CO2e. Taiheiyo Cement USA, 4 facilities, 3.57M MT CO2e. Hbm Holdings, 4 facilities, 3.45M MT CO2e. Argos USA, 4 facilities, 3.33M MT CO2e. Gcc of America, 5 facilities, 2.29M MT CO2e. Titan America, 2 facilities, 1.85M MT CO2e. Genesis Energy, 1 facilities, 1.82M MT CO2e. American Crystal Sugar, 5 facilities, 1.8M MT CO2e. National Cement CO, 2 facilities, 1.58M MT CO2e. Tata Chemicals Soda Ash Partners, 1 facilities, 1.54M MT CO2e. Votorantim Cimentos North America, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent cheney-lime-cement-co · 2023 #472 · 495K MT

CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-MINERALS · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 495K MT
  • UPPER-Q #472/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Rosebud Mining · Other
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-MINERALS Minerals
  • TREND-SURGE +35% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Rosebud Mining · Other (±2K MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.7% of 495K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.3%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.7%
493K MT
CH₄
0.1%
584 MT
N₂O
0.2%
1K MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Cheney Lime & Cement CO

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MFord Motor · Other · near498KAlliance Pipeline · Petroleu…496KCheney Lime & Cement… · Mine…495KRosebud Mining · Other · near493KZachry Construction &… · Min…492KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Cheney Lime & Cement CO · May 2026

Emissions growth across reporting years

Cheney Lime & Cement CO - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
495K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.35M0.4M0.45M0.5M0.55M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.49M

Cheney Lime & Cement CO annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Cheney Lime & Cement CO reported 495K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 368K MT in 2011 - a rise of 34.5% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Cheney Lime and Cement Company
Minerals
Alabaster, AL
495K

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (495K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Cheney Lime & Cement CO's emissions profile

  • Cheney Lime & Cement CO runs high-intensity per facility (495K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Minerals sector on the Minerals industry page.
  • It ranks #472 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Minerals emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.