EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Minerals
Anchor Hocking - declining reported GHG
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 1 reporting facility in 1 state.
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 75K
- Reporting facilities
- 1
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #1255
Data updated May 2026
Anchor Hocking reported emissions fell 43.9% since 2011 to 75K MT CO₂e in 2023.
- Overall rank #1255 of 2,289
- #78 in Minerals
- -43.9% since 2011
Anchor Hocking vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
75,179 1255th of 2289 higher than 1,034 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Anchor Hocking spreads its footprint vs Minerals peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Minerals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 3.57M MT).
You are here: Anchor Hocking.
Minerals peer footprint table: Anchor Hocking, 1 facilities, 0.08M MT CO2e. Holcim Participations (us), 12 facilities, 11.04M MT CO2e. Eagle Materials, 13 facilities, 5.84M MT CO2e. Rc Lonestar, 7 facilities, 5.59M MT CO2e. Lhoist North America, 10 facilities, 5.45M MT CO2e. Cemex, 7 facilities, 5.39M MT CO2e. Crh Americas, 7 facilities, 4.37M MT CO2e. Heidelberg Materials US Cement, 6 facilities, 4.17M MT CO2e. Carmeuse Lime, 10 facilities, 4.13M MT CO2e. Martin Marietta Materials, 4 facilities, 4M MT CO2e. Graymont, 9 facilities, 3.71M MT CO2e. Taiheiyo Cement USA, 4 facilities, 3.57M MT CO2e. Hbm Holdings, 4 facilities, 3.45M MT CO2e. Argos USA, 4 facilities, 3.33M MT CO2e. Gcc of America, 5 facilities, 2.29M MT CO2e. Titan America, 2 facilities, 1.85M MT CO2e. Genesis Energy, 1 facilities, 1.82M MT CO2e. American Crystal Sugar, 5 facilities, 1.8M MT CO2e. National Cement CO, 2 facilities, 1.58M MT CO2e. Tata Chemicals Soda Ash Partners, 1 facilities, 1.54M MT CO2e. Votorantim Cimentos North America, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent anchor-hocking · 2023 #1255 · 75K MT
CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-MINERALS · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-THIN 75K MT
- MID-PACK #1255/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Cumberland County Sol… · Waste
- FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-MINERALS Minerals
- TREND-CUT −44% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Cumberland County Solid Waste Management · Waste (±17 MT)
Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 75K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 75K MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 30 MT
- N₂O
- 0%
- 36 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Anchor Hocking
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Emissions decline across reporting years
Anchor Hocking - declining annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 75K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Anchor Hocking annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Anchor Hocking reported 75K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 134K MT in 2011 - a decline of 43.9% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Facilities (1)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| ANCHOR HOCKING GLASS CO PLANT NO 1 * Minerals LANCASTER, OH | LANCASTER, OH | 75K |
Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles
Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Anchor Hocking. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Minerals browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (75K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (1 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (75K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Anchor Hocking's emissions profile
- Anchor Hocking runs mid-intensity per facility (75K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Minerals sector on the Minerals industry page.
- It ranks #1255 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Minerals emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.