EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems

Aspen Midstream - per-facility CO₂e intensity

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), high per-facility intensity (155K MT/site) across 1 reporting facility in 1 state.

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
155K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#841
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

155K MT CO₂e · 2023

Aspen Midstream averages 155K MT CO₂e per reporting facility (high-intensity NTILE) on 155K MT total in 2023.

  • Overall rank #841 of 2,289
  • #63 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
  • +126.0% since 2020

Aspen Midstream vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

155,102 841st of 2289 higher than 1,448 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Aspen Midstream spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).

Median split: 21 facilities, 2.77M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 050100150200 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Median split: 21 facilities, 2.77M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers.

You are here: Aspen Midstream.

Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: Aspen Midstream, 1 facilities, 0.16M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent aspen-midstream · 2023 #841 · 155K MT

CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 155K MT
  • MID-PACK #841/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Kronospan · Other
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
  • TREND-SURGE +126% since 2020
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Kronospan · Other (±205 MT)

Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.

2023 methane-weighted parent mix

Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Aspen Midstream: CH₄ is 3.2% of 155K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 3.2%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
96.8%
150K MT
CH₄
3.2%
5K MT
N₂O
0%
38 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Aspen Midstream

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MModesto Irrigation Di… · Pow…156KAspen Midstream · Petroleum …155KKronospan · Other · near155KRtx · Other · near155KRoseville Electric · Power P…154KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Aspen Midstream · May 2026

Emissions growth across reporting years

Aspen Midstream - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2020–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
155K MT
4 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.06M0.08M0.1M0.12M0.14M0.16M0.18M 2020202120222023 0.16M

Aspen Midstream annual reported GHG emissions, 2020–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Aspen Midstream reported 155K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 69K MT in 2020 - a rise of 126.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Battle Horse Plant
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Brenham, TX
155K

Nationwide parents with similar intensity profiles

Intensity-led peer sets around 155K MT per facility, plus nearest totals and facility-book matches.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Aspen Midstream's emissions profile

  • Aspen Midstream runs high-intensity per facility (155K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
  • It ranks #841 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.