EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants

Modesto Irrigation District - declining reported GHG

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 2 reporting facilities in 1 state.

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
156K
Reporting facilities
2
States covered
1
Overall rank
#840
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

156K MT CO₂e · 2023

Modesto Irrigation District reported emissions fell 27.3% since 2011 to 156K MT CO₂e in 2023.

  • Overall rank #840 of 2,289
  • #292 in Power Plants
  • -27.3% since 2011

Modesto Irrigation District vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

155,562 840th of 2289 higher than 1,449 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Modesto Irrigation District spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).

Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 01020304050 0M20M40M60M80M100M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Power Plants
Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers.

You are here: Modesto Irrigation District.

Power Plants peer footprint table: Modesto Irrigation District, 2 facilities, 0.16M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent modesto-irrigation-district · 2023 #840 · 156K MT

CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 156K MT
  • MID-PACK #840/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Aspen Midstream · Petroleum and…
  • FAC-PAIR 2 facilities
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
  • TREND-CUT −27% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Aspen Midstream · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems (±460 MT)

Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 156K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
155K MT
CH₄
0%
73 MT
N₂O
0.1%
86 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Modesto Irrigation District

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MReal Alloy Holding · Metals …157KModesto Irrigation Di… · Pow…156KAspen Midstream · Petroleum …155KKronospan · Other · near155KRtx · Other · near155KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Modesto Irrigation District · May 2026

Largest facilities by reported emissions

Modesto Irrigation District - top facilities (MT CO₂e)

Woodland Generation Station148KRipon Generation Station7K

Modesto Irrigation District's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Emissions decline across reporting years

Modesto Irrigation District - declining annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
156K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.15M0.2M0.25M0.3M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.16M

Modesto Irrigation District annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Modesto Irrigation District reported 156K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 214K MT in 2011 - a decline of 27.3% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (2)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Woodland Generation Station
Power Plants
MODESTO, CA
148K
Ripon Generation Station
Power Plants
RIPON, CA
7K

Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles

Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Modesto Irrigation District. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Power Plants browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Modesto Irrigation District's emissions profile

  • Modesto Irrigation District runs mid-intensity per facility (78K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
  • It ranks #840 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.