EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Minerals

Austin White Lime - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 1 facility across 1 state (232K MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
232K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#686
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

232K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Austin White Lime reported 232K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #686 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 14% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #686 of 2,289
  • #60 in Minerals
  • -14.4% since 2011

Austin White Lime vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

232,313 686th of 2289 higher than 1,603 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Austin White Lime spreads its footprint vs Minerals peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Minerals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 3.57M MT).

Median split: 5 facilities, 3.57M MT CO₂e among Minerals peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 051015 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Minerals
Median split: 5 facilities, 3.57M MT CO₂e among Minerals peers.

You are here: Austin White Lime.

Minerals peer footprint table: Austin White Lime, 1 facilities, 0.23M MT CO2e. Holcim Participations (us), 12 facilities, 11.04M MT CO2e. Eagle Materials, 13 facilities, 5.84M MT CO2e. Rc Lonestar, 7 facilities, 5.59M MT CO2e. Lhoist North America, 10 facilities, 5.45M MT CO2e. Cemex, 7 facilities, 5.39M MT CO2e. Crh Americas, 7 facilities, 4.37M MT CO2e. Heidelberg Materials US Cement, 6 facilities, 4.17M MT CO2e. Carmeuse Lime, 10 facilities, 4.13M MT CO2e. Martin Marietta Materials, 4 facilities, 4M MT CO2e. Graymont, 9 facilities, 3.71M MT CO2e. Taiheiyo Cement USA, 4 facilities, 3.57M MT CO2e. Hbm Holdings, 4 facilities, 3.45M MT CO2e. Argos USA, 4 facilities, 3.33M MT CO2e. Gcc of America, 5 facilities, 2.29M MT CO2e. Titan America, 2 facilities, 1.85M MT CO2e. Genesis Energy, 1 facilities, 1.82M MT CO2e. American Crystal Sugar, 5 facilities, 1.8M MT CO2e. National Cement CO, 2 facilities, 1.58M MT CO2e. Tata Chemicals Soda Ash Partners, 1 facilities, 1.54M MT CO2e. Votorantim Cimentos North America, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent austin-white-lime · 2023 #686 · 232K MT

CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-MINERALS · TREND-DOWN · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 232K MT
  • MID-PACK #686/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Spectra Energy · Natural Gas a…
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-MINERALS Minerals
  • TREND-DOWN −14% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Spectra Energy · Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers (±895 MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (100% of 232K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
100%
232K MT
CH₄
0%
36 MT
N₂O
0%
43 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Austin White Lime

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MImerys USA · Minerals · near235KFr&s · Waste · near233KAustin White Lime · Minerals…232KSpectra Energy · Natural Gas…231KPhoenix Global · Metals · ne…230KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Austin White Lime · May 2026

Emissions decline across reporting years

Austin White Lime - declining annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
232K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.15M0.2M0.25M0.3M0.35M0.4M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.23M

Austin White Lime annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Austin White Lime reported 232K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 271K MT in 2011 - a decline of 14.4% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
AUSTIN WHITE LIME COMPANY MCNEIL PLANT & QUARRY
Minerals
AUSTIN, TX
232K

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (232K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Similar reported CO₂e

Nearest parent totals (232K MT here).

Similar facility book

Nearest reporting-facility counts (1 here).

Similar per-facility CO₂e

Nearest average MT per facility (232K MT here).

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Austin White Lime's emissions profile

  • Austin White Lime runs high-intensity per facility (232K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Minerals sector on the Minerals industry page.
  • It ranks #686 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Minerals emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.