EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Waste
Avista - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 5 facilities across 3 states (2.1M MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 2.1M
- Reporting facilities
- 5
- States covered
- 3
- Overall rank
- #215
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Avista reported 2.1M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 5 facilities in 3 states (ranks among the top 10% of U.S. corporate GHG emitters (#215 of 2,289)) Emissions increased 278% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #215 of 2,289
- #7 in Waste
- +278.0% since 2011
Avista vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
2,072,924 215th of 2289 higher than 2,074 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Avista spreads its footprint vs Waste peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Waste companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 0.77M MT).
You are here: Avista.
Waste peer footprint table: Avista, 5 facilities, 2.07M MT CO2e. Waste Management, 225 facilities, 11.65M MT CO2e. Republic Services, 177 facilities, 10.72M MT CO2e. Covanta Holding, 22 facilities, 4.2M MT CO2e. Waste Connections US, 40 facilities, 3.63M MT CO2e. Gfl Environmental Holdings (us), 30 facilities, 2.45M MT CO2e. Wheelabrator Technologies Holdings, 12 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. Rumpke Consolidated Cos, 9 facilities, 1.69M MT CO2e. County of Orange California, 5 facilities, 1.13M MT CO2e. County of Lycoming Pennsylvania, 1 facilities, 0.9M MT CO2e. County of Pinellas Florida, 2 facilities, 0.77M MT CO2e. Apex Environmental, 1 facilities, 0.7M MT CO2e. County of Brevard Florida, 1 facilities, 0.67M MT CO2e. City of El Paso Texas, 2 facilities, 0.54M MT CO2e. Waste Connections, 8 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. City of Baton Rouge Louisiana, 2 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County Florida, 3 facilities, 0.5M MT CO2e. City of Dallas Texas, 1 facilities, 0.48M MT CO2e. Casella Waste Systems, 9 facilities, 0.46M MT CO2e. County of Polk Florida, 1 facilities, 0.43M MT CO2e. US Government, 9 facilities, 0.42M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent avista · 2023 #215 · 2.1M MT
CO2E-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-WASTE · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MID 2.1M MT
- TOP-DECILE #215/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH City Utilities of Spr… · Power Plants
- FAC-PAIR 5 facilities
- SPAN-PAIR 3 states
- SECTOR-WASTE Waste
- TREND-SURGE +278% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: City Utilities of Springfield Missouri · Power Plants (±237 MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.3% of 2.1M MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.7%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.3%
- 2.1M MT
- CH₄
- 0.4%
- 8K MT
- N₂O
- 0.3%
- 6K MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Avista
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Avista - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Avista's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Avista - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 2.1M MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Avista annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Avista reported 2.1M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 548K MT in 2011 - a rise of 278.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (5)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Coyote Springs Power Plants BOARDMAN, OR | BOARDMAN, OR | 1.6M |
| Rathdrum Combustion Turbine Project Power Plants RATHDRUM, ID | RATHDRUM, ID | 436K |
| Boulder Park Generating Station Power Plants Spokane Valley, WA | Spokane Valley, WA | 31K |
| Kettle Falls Generating Station Power Plants Kettle Falls, WA | Kettle Falls, WA | 22K |
| Avista Landfill Waste Kettle Falls, WA | Kettle Falls, WA | 6K |
Where Avista's reported CO₂e sits by state
76.1% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Oregon (1 site) ; next is Idaho at 21% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Avista reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Avista's reported CO₂e by EPA sector
Top sector Power Plants is 99.7% of this parent's facility CO₂e (4 sites) ; Waste follows at 0.3% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.
Avista reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (2.1M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (2.1M MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (5 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (415K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Avista's emissions profile
- Avista runs high-intensity per facility (415K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Waste sector on the Waste industry page.
- It ranks #215 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Waste emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.