EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants
Mdu Resources Group - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 8 facilities across 5 states (2.0M MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 2.0M
- Reporting facilities
- 8
- States covered
- 5
- Overall rank
- #216
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Mdu Resources Group reported 2.0M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 8 facilities in 5 states (ranks among the top 10% of U.S. corporate GHG emitters (#216 of 2,289)) Emissions decreased 45% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #216 of 2,289
- #125 in Power Plants
- -45.2% since 2011
Mdu Resources Group vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
2,030,794 216th of 2289 higher than 2,073 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Mdu Resources Group spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).
You are here: Mdu Resources Group.
Power Plants peer footprint table: Mdu Resources Group, 8 facilities, 2.03M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent mdu-resources-group · 2023 #216 · 2.0M MT
CO2E-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-MULTI · SPAN-MULTI · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MID 2.0M MT
- TOP-DECILE #216/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Colorado Springs Util… · Power Plants
- FAC-MULTI 8 facilities
- SPAN-MULTI 5 states
- SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
- TREND-CUT −45% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Colorado Springs Utilities · Power Plants (±8K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 methane-weighted parent mix
Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Mdu Resources Group: CH₄ is 1.7% of 2.0M MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0.5%). Non-CO₂ gases total 2.1%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 97.9%
- 2.0M MT
- CH₄
- 1.7%
- 34K MT
- N₂O
- 0.5%
- 10K MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Mdu Resources Group
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Mdu Resources Group - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Mdu Resources Group's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions decline across reporting years
Mdu Resources Group - declining annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 2.0M MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Mdu Resources Group annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Mdu Resources Group reported 2.0M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 3.7M MT in 2011 - a decline of 45.2% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (8)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Big Stone Power Plants BIG STONE CITY, SD | BIG STONE CITY, SD | 1.9M |
| Tioga Compressor Station Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Tioga, ND | Tioga, ND | 32K |
| Cabin Creek Compressor Station Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Baker, MT | Baker, MT | 29K |
| R M Heskett Power Plants MANDAN, ND | MANDAN, ND | 22K |
| Charbonneau Compressor Station Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Cartwright, ND | Cartwright, ND | 19K |
| Lewis & Clark Power Plants RICHLAND, MT | RICHLAND, MT | 10K |
| Cascade Natural Gas Coporation - Washington Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers Kennewick, WA | Kennewick, WA | 24 |
| Intermountain Gas Company Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers Boise, ID | Boise, ID | 3 |
Where Mdu Resources Group's reported CO₂e sits by state
94.5% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in South Dakota (1 site) ; next is North Dakota at 3.6% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Mdu Resources Group reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Mdu Resources Group's reported CO₂e by EPA sector
Top sector Power Plants is 96.1% of this parent's facility CO₂e (3 sites) ; Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems follows at 3.9% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.
Mdu Resources Group reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (2.0M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (2.0M MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (8 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (254K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Mdu Resources Group's emissions profile
- Mdu Resources Group runs high-intensity per facility (254K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
- It ranks #216 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.