EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems

Bp America - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 10 facilities across 7 states (9.3M MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
9.3M
Reporting facilities
10
States covered
7
Overall rank
#53
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

9.3M MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Bp America reported 9.3M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 10 facilities in 7 states (ranks among the top 5% of U.S. corporate GHG emitters (#53 of 2,289)) Emissions remained broadly stable over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #53 of 2,289
  • #4 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
  • -0.2% since 2011

Bp America vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

9,275,399 53rd of 2289 higher than 2,236 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Bp America spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.84M MT).

Median split: 21 facilities, 2.84M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 050100150200 0M2M4M6M8M10M12M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Median split: 21 facilities, 2.84M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers.

You are here: Bp America.

Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: Bp America, 10 facilities, 9.28M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent bp-america · 2023 #53 · 9.3M MT

CO2E-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-MULTI · SPAN-MULTI · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-FLAT · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MID 9.3M MT
  • TOP-DECILE #53/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Austin Energy · Power Plants
  • FAC-MULTI 10 facilities
  • SPAN-MULTI 7 states
  • SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
  • TREND-FLAT −0% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Austin Energy · Power Plants (±90K MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (98.7% of 9.0M MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 1.3%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
98.7%
8.9M MT
CH₄
1.1%
96K MT
N₂O
0.2%
19K MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Bp America

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MBuckeye Power · Power Plants…9.4MAustin Energy · Power Plants…9.4MBp America · Petroleum a… · …9.3MKinder Morgan · Petroleum a……9.1MLyondellbasell Indust… · Che…9.0MPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Bp America · May 2026

Largest sites in a top-third parent book

Bp America - top sites (MT CO₂e)

BP Whiting Business Unit5.2MBP CHERRY POINT REFINERY2.2MOhio Refining Company LLC887KAtlantis, MMS Platform ID 02…256KFlorida River Gas Processing…196KHAWKVILLE GAS TREATING FACIL…158KNakika, MMS Platform ID 0248…125KMad Dog. MMS Platform ID 024…112K

Bp America's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

High-emitter reporting timeline

Bp America - high-emitter annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
9.0M MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
8.5M9M9.5M10M 2011201320152017201920212023 9.04M

Bp America annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Bp America reported 9.0M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 9.1M MT in 2011 - a decline of 0.2% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Wide facility book (10)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
BP Whiting Business Unit
Chemicals
WHITING, IN
5.2M
BP CHERRY POINT REFINERY
Chemicals
BLAINE, WA
2.2M
Ohio Refining Company LLC
Petroleum Product Suppliers
OREGON, OH
887K
Atlantis, MMS Platform ID 02481, Complex ID 1223-1
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Offshore, LA
256K
Florida River Gas Processing Facility
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
DURANGO, CO
196K
HAWKVILLE GAS TREATING FACILITY
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Cotulla, TX
158K
Nakika, MMS Platform ID 02481, Complex ID 1001-1
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Offshore, LA
125K
Mad Dog. MMS Platform ID 02481, Complex ID 1215-1
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Offshore, LA
112K
Hawkville North East Central Delivery Point
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Tilden, TX
75K
PEI Power Corporation
Power Plants
ARCHBALD, PA
65K

Where Bp America's reported CO₂e sits by state

56.3% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Indiana (1 site) ; next is Washington at 23.5% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.

IN5.2MWA2.2MOH887KLA493KTX234KCO196KPA65K
EPA GHGRP · Bp America facility CO₂e by state · May 2026

Bp America reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Bp America's reported CO₂e by EPA sector

Top sector Chemicals is 79.8% of this parent's facility CO₂e (2 sites) ; Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems follows at 10% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.

Chemicals7.4MPetroleum and Natural Gas Sy…923KPetroleum Product Suppliers887KPower Plants65K
EPA GHGRP · Bp America facility CO₂e by sector · May 2026

Bp America reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (9.3M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Bp America's emissions profile

  • Bp America runs high-intensity per facility (928K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
  • It ranks #53 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.