EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Other
Bunge North America - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 7 facilities across 5 states (470K MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 470K
- Reporting facilities
- 7
- States covered
- 5
- Overall rank
- #488
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Bunge North America reported 470K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 7 facilities in 5 states (ranks #488 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 6% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #488 of 2,289
- #52 in Other
- -6.0% since 2011
Bunge North America vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
470,267 488th of 2289 higher than 1,801 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Bunge North America spreads its footprint vs Other peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Other companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 2.28M MT).
You are here: Bunge North America.
Other peer footprint table: Bunge North America, 7 facilities, 0.47M MT CO2e. Prairie State Energy Campus Management, 1 facilities, 11.46M MT CO2e. Marathon Petroleum, 4 facilities, 7.11M MT CO2e. Archer Daniels Midland, 15 facilities, 6.67M MT CO2e. Consol Energy, 4 facilities, 6.53M MT CO2e. American Consolidated Natural Resources, 6 facilities, 6.29M MT CO2e. Hummel Station, 1 facilities, 2.91M MT CO2e. Arch Resources, 5 facilities, 2.83M MT CO2e. US Government, 51 facilities, 2.78M MT CO2e. Poet, 28 facilities, 2.66M MT CO2e. Cargill, 27 facilities, 2.51M MT CO2e. Alliance Holdings Gp, 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO2e. Valero Energy, 12 facilities, 2.24M MT CO2e. Tyson Foods, 31 facilities, 1.72M MT CO2e. Iron Senergy Holding, 1 facilities, 1.64M MT CO2e. Karnavati Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. Hatfield Metallurgical Intermediate Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.38M MT CO2e. Alpha Metallurgical Resources, 9 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e. Hallador Energy, 2 facilities, 1.32M MT CO2e. Green Plains, 11 facilities, 1.3M MT CO2e. Coronado Group, 3 facilities, 1.28M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent bunge-north-america · 2023 #488 · 470K MT
CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-MULTI · SECTOR-OTHER · TREND-DOWN · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 470K MT
- UPPER-Q #488/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Michigan Sugar · Minerals
- FAC-PAIR 7 facilities
- SPAN-MULTI 5 states
- SECTOR-OTHER Other
- TREND-DOWN −6% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Michigan Sugar · Minerals (±1K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 470K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 470K MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 222 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 264 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Bunge North America
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Bunge North America - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Bunge North America's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
High-emitter reporting timeline
Bunge North America - high-emitter annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 470K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Bunge North America annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Bunge North America reported 470K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 500K MT in 2011 - a decline of 6.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (7)
How Bunge North America's 470K MT CO₂e total splits across its reporting facilities.
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Bunge Other Council Bluffs, IA | Council Bluffs, IA | 112K |
| BUNGE NORTH AMERICA INC Other DECATUR, AL | DECATUR, AL | 84K |
| BUNGE NORTH AMERICA Other BELLEVUE, OH | BELLEVUE, OH | 75K |
| BUNGE NORTH AMERICA Other MORRISTOWN, IN | MORRISTOWN, IN | 72K |
| Bunge North America (East) LLC Other Decatur, IN | Decatur, IN | 69K |
| BUNGE NORTH AMERICA, INC. Other EMPORIA, KS | EMPORIA, KS | 33K |
| Bunge North America (East) LLC Other Delphos, OH | Delphos, OH | 26K |
Where Bunge North America's reported CO₂e sits by state
30% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Indiana (2 sites) ; next is Iowa at 23.9% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Bunge North America reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (470K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (470K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (7 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (67K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Bunge North America's emissions profile
- Bunge North America runs mid-intensity per facility (67K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Other sector on the Other industry page.
- It ranks #488 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Other emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.