EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Minerals
Michigan Sugar - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 4 facilities across 1 state (472K MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 472K
- Reporting facilities
- 4
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #487
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Michigan Sugar reported 472K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 4 facilities in 1 state (ranks #487 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 15% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #487 of 2,289
- #50 in Minerals
- +15.0% since 2011
Michigan Sugar vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
471,695 487th of 2289 higher than 1,802 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Michigan Sugar spreads its footprint vs Minerals peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Minerals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 3.57M MT).
You are here: Michigan Sugar.
Minerals peer footprint table: Michigan Sugar, 4 facilities, 0.47M MT CO2e. Holcim Participations (us), 12 facilities, 11.04M MT CO2e. Eagle Materials, 13 facilities, 5.84M MT CO2e. Rc Lonestar, 7 facilities, 5.59M MT CO2e. Lhoist North America, 10 facilities, 5.45M MT CO2e. Cemex, 7 facilities, 5.39M MT CO2e. Crh Americas, 7 facilities, 4.37M MT CO2e. Heidelberg Materials US Cement, 6 facilities, 4.17M MT CO2e. Carmeuse Lime, 10 facilities, 4.13M MT CO2e. Martin Marietta Materials, 4 facilities, 4M MT CO2e. Graymont, 9 facilities, 3.71M MT CO2e. Taiheiyo Cement USA, 4 facilities, 3.57M MT CO2e. Hbm Holdings, 4 facilities, 3.45M MT CO2e. Argos USA, 4 facilities, 3.33M MT CO2e. Gcc of America, 5 facilities, 2.29M MT CO2e. Titan America, 2 facilities, 1.85M MT CO2e. Genesis Energy, 1 facilities, 1.82M MT CO2e. American Crystal Sugar, 5 facilities, 1.8M MT CO2e. National Cement CO, 2 facilities, 1.58M MT CO2e. Tata Chemicals Soda Ash Partners, 1 facilities, 1.54M MT CO2e. Votorantim Cimentos North America, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent michigan-sugar · 2023 #487 · 472K MT
CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-MINERALS · TREND-UP · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 472K MT
- UPPER-Q #487/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Microchip Technology · Other
- FAC-PAIR 4 facilities
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-MINERALS Minerals
- TREND-UP +15% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Microchip Technology · Other (±1K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.8% of 472K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.2%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.8%
- 471K MT
- CH₄
- 0.1%
- 388 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 608 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Michigan Sugar
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Michigan Sugar - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Michigan Sugar's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Michigan Sugar - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 472K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Michigan Sugar annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Michigan Sugar reported 472K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 410K MT in 2011 - a rise of 15.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (4)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| MICHIGAN SUGAR COMPANY - Bay City Minerals BAY CITY, MI | BAY CITY, MI | 179K |
| MICHIGAN SUGAR COMPANY - SEBEWAING FACTORY Minerals SEBEWAING, MI | SEBEWAING, MI | 129K |
| MICHIGAN SUGAR CO - CROSWELL FACTORY Minerals CROSWELL, MI | CROSWELL, MI | 90K |
| MICHIGAN SUGAR CO - CARO FACTORY Minerals CARO, MI | CARO, MI | 74K |
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (472K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (472K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (4 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (118K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Michigan Sugar's emissions profile
- Michigan Sugar runs high-intensity per facility (118K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Minerals sector on the Minerals industry page.
- It ranks #487 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Minerals emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.