EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems

Cantium - rising reported GHG

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 4 reporting facilities in 1 state.

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
175K
Reporting facilities
4
States covered
1
Overall rank
#786
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

175K MT CO₂e · 2023

Cantium reported emissions rose 78.2% since 2011 to 175K MT CO₂e in 2023.

  • Overall rank #786 of 2,289
  • #60 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
  • +78.2% since 2011

Cantium vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

175,452 786th of 2289 higher than 1,503 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Cantium spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).

Median split: 21 facilities, 2.77M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 050100150200 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Median split: 21 facilities, 2.77M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers.

You are here: Cantium.

Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: Cantium, 4 facilities, 0.18M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent cantium · 2023 #786 · 175K MT

CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 175K MT
  • MID-PACK #786/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Municipality of Ancho… · Waste
  • FAC-PAIR 4 facilities
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
  • TREND-SURGE +78% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Municipality of Anchorage - Solid Waste Service · Waste (±307 MT)

Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.

2023 methane-weighted parent mix

Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Cantium: CH₄ is 49.1% of 175K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 49.1%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
50.9%
89K MT
CH₄
49.1%
86K MT
N₂O
0%
50 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Cantium

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MCounty of Spartanburg… · Was…176KMunicipality of Ancho… · Was…176KCantium · Petroleum a… · thi…175KVallourec Star · Metals · ne…175KCasey · Petroleum P… · near174KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Cantium · May 2026

Largest facilities by reported emissions

Cantium - top facilities (MT CO₂e)

Main Pass 41 B O BB71KMain Pass 42 D L M47KMain Pass 300 B29KMain Pass 313 A28K

Cantium's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Emissions growth across reporting years

Cantium - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
175K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.05M0.1M0.15M0.2M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.18M

Cantium annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Cantium reported 175K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 98K MT in 2011 - a rise of 78.2% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Multi-site facilities (4)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Main Pass 41 B O BB
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Offshore, LA
71K
Main Pass 42 D L M
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Offshore, LA
47K
Main Pass 300 B
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Covington, LA
29K
Main Pass 313 A
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Covington, LA
28K

Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles

Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Cantium. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Cantium's emissions profile

  • Cantium runs mid-intensity per facility (44K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
  • It ranks #786 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.