EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Chemicals

International Flavors & Fragrances - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 7 facilities across 7 states (307K MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
307K
Reporting facilities
7
States covered
7
Overall rank
#605
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

307K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, International Flavors & Fragrances reported 307K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 7 facilities in 7 states (ranks #605 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 12% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #605 of 2,289
  • #63 in Chemicals
  • -12.2% since 2011

International Flavors & Fragrances vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

307,088 605th of 2289 higher than 1,684 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How International Flavors & Fragrances spreads its footprint vs Chemicals peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Chemicals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (7 facilities, 7.4M MT).

Median split: 7 facilities, 7.4M MT CO₂e among Chemicals peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 0102030 0M10M20M30M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Chemicals
Median split: 7 facilities, 7.4M MT CO₂e among Chemicals peers.

You are here: International Flavors & Fragrances.

Chemicals peer footprint table: International Flavors & Fragrances, 7 facilities, 0.31M MT CO2e. Exxon Mobil, 4 facilities, 26.19M MT CO2e. Cf Industries Holdings, 6 facilities, 20.58M MT CO2e. Chevron, 8 facilities, 16.31M MT CO2e. Phillips 66, 9 facilities, 15.35M MT CO2e. Air Products & Chemicals, 27 facilities, 14.07M MT CO2e. Valero Energy, 7 facilities, 13.11M MT CO2e. Dow, 9 facilities, 12.33M MT CO2e. Koch Industries, 9 facilities, 11.58M MT CO2e. Marathon Petroleum, 6 facilities, 9M MT CO2e. Linde, 18 facilities, 8.79M MT CO2e. Bp America, 2 facilities, 7.4M MT CO2e. Lyondellbasell Industries, 9 facilities, 6.91M MT CO2e. Shell Petroleum, 4 facilities, 6.83M MT CO2e. American Air Liquide Holdings, 12 facilities, 6.17M MT CO2e. Eastman Chemical, 6 facilities, 6.04M MT CO2e. Formosa Plastics CORP USA, 2 facilities, 5.61M MT CO2e. Nutrien US Topco, 4 facilities, 4.67M MT CO2e. Westlake Chemical, 7 facilities, 4.44M MT CO2e. Basf, 8 facilities, 3.79M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 7 facilities, 3.5M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent international-flavors-fragrances · 2023 #605 · 307K MT

CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-MULTI · SECTOR-CHEMICALS · TREND-DOWN · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 307K MT
  • MID-PACK #605/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH American Environmenta… · Waste
  • FAC-PAIR 7 facilities
  • SPAN-MULTI 7 states
  • SECTOR-CHEMICALS Chemicals
  • TREND-DOWN −12% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: American Environmental Landfill · Waste (±13 MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 307K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
307K MT
CH₄
0.1%
170 MT
N₂O
0.1%
236 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around International Flavors & Fragrances

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MKaiser Aluminum · Metals · n…311KInternational Flavors… · Che…307KAmerican Environmenta… · Was…307KDoyon · Power Plants · near305KMicron Technology · Other · …304KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around International Flavors & Fragrances · May 2026

Largest sites in a top-third parent book

International Flavors & Fragrances - top sites (MT CO₂e)

PRYOR SOLAE109KPROTEIN TECHNOLOGIES INTERN.83KIFF CHEMICAL HOLDINGS INC30KSOLAE CO GIBSON30KInternational N&H USA, Inc.22KSolae LLC21KInternational N&H USA, INC13K

International Flavors & Fragrances's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Emissions decline across reporting years

International Flavors & Fragrances - declining annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
307K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.3M0.35M0.4M0.45M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.31M

International Flavors & Fragrances annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

International Flavors & Fragrances reported 307K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 350K MT in 2011 - a decline of 12.2% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Multi-site facilities (7)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
PRYOR SOLAE
Other
PRYOR, OK
109K
PROTEIN TECHNOLOGIES INTERN.
Other
MEMPHIS, TN
83K
IFF CHEMICAL HOLDINGS INC
Chemicals
JACKSONVILLE, FL
30K
SOLAE CO GIBSON
Other
GIBSON CITY, IL
30K
International N&H USA, Inc.
Chemicals
NEWARK, DE
22K
Solae LLC
Other
Remington, IN
21K
International N&H USA, INC
Other
ROCKLAND, ME
13K

Where International Flavors & Fragrances's reported CO₂e sits by state

35.4% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Oklahoma (1 site) ; next is Tennessee at 27% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.

OK109KTN83KFL30KIL30KDE22KIN21KME13K
EPA GHGRP · International Flavors & Fragrances facility CO₂e by state · May 2026

International Flavors & Fragrances reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

International Flavors & Fragrances's reported CO₂e by EPA sector

Top sector Other is 83% of this parent's facility CO₂e (5 sites) ; Chemicals follows at 17% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.

Other255KChemicals52K
EPA GHGRP · International Flavors & Fragrances facility CO₂e by sector · May 2026

International Flavors & Fragrances reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (307K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using International Flavors & Fragrances's emissions profile

  • International Flavors & Fragrances runs mid-intensity per facility (44K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Chemicals sector on the Chemicals industry page.
  • It ranks #605 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Chemicals emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.