EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants

Chesapeake Utilities - GHG emissions profile

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 1 reporting facility in 1 state.

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
95K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#1105
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

95K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Chesapeake Utilities reported 95K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #1,105 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions remained broadly stable over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #1105 of 2,289
  • #317 in Power Plants
  • -0.2% since 2017

Chesapeake Utilities vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

95,444 1105th of 2289 higher than 1,184 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Chesapeake Utilities spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).

Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 01020304050 0M20M40M60M80M100M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Power Plants
Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers.

You are here: Chesapeake Utilities.

Power Plants peer footprint table: Chesapeake Utilities, 1 facilities, 0.1M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent chesapeake-utilities · 2023 #1105 · 95K MT

CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-FLAT · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 95K MT
  • MID-PACK #1105/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH State of Connecticut · Other
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
  • TREND-FLAT −0% since 2017
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: State of Connecticut · Other (±12 MT)

Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 95K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
95K MT
CH₄
0%
45 MT
N₂O
0.1%
54 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Chesapeake Utilities

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MCity of Conway Arkans… · Was…96KState of Connecticut · Other…95KChesapeake Utilities · Power…95KCounty of Bartholomew… · Was…95KCounty of Erie Ohio · Waste …95KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Chesapeake Utilities · May 2026

Reported emissions over time

Chesapeake Utilities - annual reported GHG emissions

EPA GHGRP 2017–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
95K MT
7 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.09M0.09M0.1M0.1M0.11M 2017201820192020202120222023 0.1M

Chesapeake Utilities annual reported GHG emissions, 2017–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Chesapeake Utilities reported 95K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 96K MT in 2017 - a decline of 0.2% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Eight Flags Energy, LLC
Power Plants
Fernandina Beach, FL
95K

Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles

Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Chesapeake Utilities. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Power Plants browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Chesapeake Utilities's emissions profile

  • Chesapeake Utilities runs mid-intensity per facility (95K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
  • It ranks #1105 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.