EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Waste
Lancaster County Soild Waste Management Authority - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 3 facilities across 1 state (286K MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 286K
- Reporting facilities
- 3
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #621
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Lancaster County Soild Waste Management Authority reported 286K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 3 facilities in 1 state (ranks #621 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 10% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #621 of 2,289
- #35 in Waste
- -10.2% since 2011
Lancaster County Soild Waste Management Authority vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
285,799 621st of 2289 higher than 1,668 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Lancaster County Soild Waste Management Authority spreads its footprint vs Waste peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Waste companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 0.7M MT).
You are here: Lancaster County Soild Waste Management Authority.
Waste peer footprint table: Lancaster County Soild Waste Management Authority, 3 facilities, 0.29M MT CO2e. Waste Management, 225 facilities, 11.65M MT CO2e. Republic Services, 177 facilities, 10.72M MT CO2e. Covanta Holding, 22 facilities, 4.2M MT CO2e. Waste Connections US, 40 facilities, 3.63M MT CO2e. Gfl Environmental Holdings (us), 30 facilities, 2.45M MT CO2e. Wheelabrator Technologies Holdings, 12 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. Rumpke Consolidated Cos, 9 facilities, 1.69M MT CO2e. County of Orange California, 5 facilities, 1.13M MT CO2e. County of Lycoming Pennsylvania, 1 facilities, 0.9M MT CO2e. County of Pinellas Florida, 2 facilities, 0.77M MT CO2e. Apex Environmental, 1 facilities, 0.7M MT CO2e. County of Brevard Florida, 1 facilities, 0.67M MT CO2e. City of El Paso Texas, 2 facilities, 0.54M MT CO2e. Waste Connections, 8 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. City of Baton Rouge Louisiana, 2 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County Florida, 3 facilities, 0.5M MT CO2e. City of Dallas Texas, 1 facilities, 0.48M MT CO2e. Casella Waste Systems, 9 facilities, 0.46M MT CO2e. County of Polk Florida, 1 facilities, 0.43M MT CO2e. US Government, 9 facilities, 0.42M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent lancaster-county-soild-waste-management-authority · 2023 #621 · 286K MT
CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-WASTE · TREND-DOWN · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 286K MT
- MID-PACK #621/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Meritage Midstream Se… · Petroleum and…
- FAC-PAIR 3 facilities
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-WASTE Waste
- TREND-DOWN −10% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Meritage Midstream Services II · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems (±298 MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 methane-weighted parent mix
Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Lancaster County Soild Waste Management: CH₄ is 7.3% of 286K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 3.1%). Non-CO₂ gases total 10.4%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 89.6%
- 256K MT
- CH₄
- 7.3%
- 21K MT
- N₂O
- 3.1%
- 9K MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Lancaster County Soild Waste Management
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Lancaster County Soild Waste Management Authority - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Lancaster County Soild Waste Management Authority's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions decline across reporting years
Lancaster County Soild Waste Management Authority - declining annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 286K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Lancaster County Soild Waste Management Authority annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Lancaster County Soild Waste Management Authority reported 286K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 318K MT in 2011 - a decline of 10.2% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (3)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Lancaster Waste to Energy Facility Waste Bainbridge, PA | Bainbridge, PA | 161K |
| SUSQUEHANNA RESOURCE MGMT COMPLEX Waste HARRISBURG, PA | HARRISBURG, PA | 110K |
| FREY FARM-CRESWELL LDFL Waste CONESTOGA, PA | CONESTOGA, PA | 15K |
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (286K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (286K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (3 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (95K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Lancaster County Soild Waste Management Authority's emissions profile
- Lancaster County Soild Waste Management Authority runs mid-intensity per facility (95K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Waste sector on the Waste industry page.
- It ranks #621 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Waste emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.