EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Waste

City of Johnson City - lower-footprint GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), a smaller reporting parent: 32K MT CO₂e from 1 site in 1 state (2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
32K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#1850
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

32K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, City of Johnson City reported 32K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #1,850 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 46% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #1850 of 2,289
  • #453 in Waste
  • -45.8% since 2011

City of Johnson City vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

31,913 1850th of 2289 higher than 439 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How City of Johnson City spreads its footprint vs Waste peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Waste companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 0.7M MT).

Median split: 5 facilities, 0.7M MT CO₂e among Waste peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 050100150200250 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Waste
Median split: 5 facilities, 0.7M MT CO₂e among Waste peers.

You are here: City of Johnson City.

Waste peer footprint table: City of Johnson City, 1 facilities, 0.03M MT CO2e. Waste Management, 225 facilities, 11.65M MT CO2e. Republic Services, 177 facilities, 10.72M MT CO2e. Covanta Holding, 22 facilities, 4.2M MT CO2e. Waste Connections US, 40 facilities, 3.63M MT CO2e. Gfl Environmental Holdings (us), 30 facilities, 2.45M MT CO2e. Wheelabrator Technologies Holdings, 12 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. Rumpke Consolidated Cos, 9 facilities, 1.69M MT CO2e. County of Orange California, 5 facilities, 1.13M MT CO2e. County of Lycoming Pennsylvania, 1 facilities, 0.9M MT CO2e. County of Pinellas Florida, 2 facilities, 0.77M MT CO2e. Apex Environmental, 1 facilities, 0.7M MT CO2e. County of Brevard Florida, 1 facilities, 0.67M MT CO2e. City of El Paso Texas, 2 facilities, 0.54M MT CO2e. Waste Connections, 8 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. City of Baton Rouge Louisiana, 2 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County Florida, 3 facilities, 0.5M MT CO2e. City of Dallas Texas, 1 facilities, 0.48M MT CO2e. Casella Waste Systems, 9 facilities, 0.46M MT CO2e. County of Polk Florida, 1 facilities, 0.43M MT CO2e. US Government, 9 facilities, 0.42M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent city-of-johnson-city · 2023 #1850 · 32K MT

CO2E-THIN · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-WASTE · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 32K MT
  • LOWER-Q #1850/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Rochester Public Util… · Power Plants
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-WASTE Waste
  • TREND-CUT −46% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Rochester Public Utilities · Power Plants (±2 MT)

Lower-footprint parent stamps from this GHGRP rollup, comparative context only, not a compliance rating.

2023 methane-weighted parent mix

Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for City of Johnson City: CH₄ is 99.3% of 32K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 99.3%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
0.7%
209 MT
CH₄
99.3%
32K MT
N₂O
-
n/r

CO₂e neighbourhood around City of Johnson City

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MState of Nebraska · Other · …32KCity of Johnson City · Waste…32KRochester Public Util… · Pow…32KWashington Potato · Other · …32KSolid Waste Managemen… · Was…32KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around City of Johnson City · May 2026

Emissions decline across reporting years

City of Johnson City - declining annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
32K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.02M0.03M0.04M0.05M0.06M0.07M0.08M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.03M

City of Johnson City annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

City of Johnson City reported 32K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 59K MT in 2011 - a decline of 45.8% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
IRIS GLEN ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER
Waste
JOHNSON CITY, TN
32K

Nationwide peers for a lower-footprint parent

Comparison paths for a smaller GHGRP parent: nearest CO₂e totals, similar facility counts, and intensity neighbors beyond Waste browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using City of Johnson City's emissions profile

  • City of Johnson City runs low-intensity per facility (32K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Waste sector on the Waste industry page.
  • It ranks #1850 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Waste emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.