EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants
Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission - per-facility CO₂e intensity
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 2 reporting facilities in 1 state.
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 64K
- Reporting facilities
- 2
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #1358
Data updated May 2026
Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission averages 32K MT CO₂e per reporting facility (low-intensity NTILE) on 64K MT total in 2023.
- Overall rank #1358 of 2,289
- #342 in Power Plants
- +5.9% since 2011
Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
63,888 1358th of 2289 higher than 931 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).
You are here: Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission.
Power Plants peer footprint table: Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission, 2 facilities, 0.06M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent missouri-joint-municipal-electric-utility-commission · 2023 #1358 · 64K MT
CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-UP · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-THIN 64K MT
- MID-PACK #1358/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Arizona State Univers… · Other
- FAC-PAIR 2 facilities
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
- TREND-UP +6% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Arizona State University · Other (±5 MT)
Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 64K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 64K MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 30 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 36 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Com…
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest facilities by reported emissions
Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission - top facilities (MT CO₂e)
Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Reported emissions over time
Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission - annual reported GHG emissions
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 64K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission reported 64K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 60K MT in 2011 - a rise of 5.9% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Facilities (2)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| MJMEUC GENERATING STATION 1 Power Plants LADDONIA, MO | LADDONIA, MO | 60K |
| Fredericktown Energy Center Power Plants Fredericktown, MO | Fredericktown, MO | 4K |
Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles
Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Power Plants browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (64K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (2 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (32K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission's emissions profile
- Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission runs low-intensity per facility (32K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
- It ranks #1358 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.