EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Clearfork Midstream - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 3 facilities across 2 states (339K MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 339K
- Reporting facilities
- 3
- States covered
- 2
- Overall rank
- #571
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Clearfork Midstream reported 339K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 3 facilities in 2 states (ranks #571 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 73% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #571 of 2,289
- #44 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- +73.0% since 2011
Clearfork Midstream vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
338,698 571st of 2289 higher than 1,718 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Clearfork Midstream spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).
You are here: Clearfork Midstream.
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: Clearfork Midstream, 3 facilities, 0.34M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent clearfork-midstream · 2023 #571 · 339K MT
CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 339K MT
- UPPER-Q #571/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Matanuska Electric As… · Power Plants
- FAC-PAIR 3 facilities
- SPAN-PAIR 2 states
- SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
- TREND-SURGE +73% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Matanuska Electric Assoc · Power Plants (±732 MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.1% of 339K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.9%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.1%
- 336K MT
- CH₄
- 0.8%
- 3K MT
- N₂O
- 0%
- 84 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Clearfork Midstream
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Clearfork Midstream - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Clearfork Midstream's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Clearfork Midstream - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 339K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Clearfork Midstream annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Clearfork Midstream reported 339K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 196K MT in 2011 - a rise of 73.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (3)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| TGG PIPELINE, LTD. - HOLLY COMMON POINT #3 COMPRESSOR STATION Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Grand Cane, LA | Grand Cane, LA | 167K |
| TGG PIPELINE, LTD. - HOLLY COMMON POINT #6 FACILITY Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems SHREVEPORT, LA | SHREVEPORT, LA | 112K |
| TGG SHELBY ASSETS, LLC - SHELBY #3 FACILITY Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems CENTER, TX | CENTER, TX | 59K |
Where Clearfork Midstream's reported CO₂e sits by state
82.6% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Louisiana (2 sites) ; next is Texas at 17.4% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Clearfork Midstream reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (339K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (339K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (3 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (113K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Clearfork Midstream's emissions profile
- Clearfork Midstream runs mid-intensity per facility (113K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
- It ranks #571 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.