EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
PG&E - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 7 facilities across 1 state (340K MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 340K
- Reporting facilities
- 7
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #570
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, PG&E reported 340K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 7 facilities in 1 state (ranks #570 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 30% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #570 of 2,289
- #43 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- +29.6% since 2011
PG&E vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
340,080 570th of 2289 higher than 1,719 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How PG&E spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).
You are here: PG&E.
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: PG&E, 7 facilities, 0.34M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent pg-e · 2023 #570 · 340K MT
CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 340K MT
- UPPER-Q #570/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Clearfork Midstream · Petroleum and…
- FAC-PAIR 7 facilities
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
- TREND-SURGE +30% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Clearfork Midstream · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems (±1K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 methane-weighted parent mix
Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for PG&E: CH₄ is 5.2% of 340K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0.1%). Non-CO₂ gases total 5.3%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 94.7%
- 322K MT
- CH₄
- 5.2%
- 18K MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 181 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around PG&E
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
PG&E - top sites (MT CO₂e)
PG&E's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
PG&E - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 340K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
PG&E annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
PG&E reported 340K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 262K MT in 2011 - a rise of 29.6% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (7)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| PG&E GERBER COMPRESSOR STATION Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems GERBER, CA | GERBER, CA | 62K |
| PG&E HINKLEY COMPRESSOR STATION Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems HINKLEY, CA | HINKLEY, CA | 60K |
| PG&E BURNEY COMPRESSOR STATION Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Burney, CA | Burney, CA | 60K |
| PG&E TOPOCK COMPRESSOR STATION Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems NEEDLES, CA | NEEDLES, CA | 47K |
| PG&E DELEVAN COMPRESSOR STATION Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Maxwell, CA | Maxwell, CA | 43K |
| PG&E KETTLEMAN COMPRESSOR STATION Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems AVENAL, CA | AVENAL, CA | 40K |
| PG&E TIONESTA COMPRESSOR STATION Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Tionesta, CA | Tionesta, CA | 28K |
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (340K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (340K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (7 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (49K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using PG&E's emissions profile
- PG&E runs mid-intensity per facility (49K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
- It ranks #570 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.