EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Cms Energy - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 8 facilities across 1 state (10.2M MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 10.2M
- Reporting facilities
- 8
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #48
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Cms Energy reported 10.2M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 8 facilities in 1 state (ranks among the top 5% of U.S. corporate GHG emitters (#48 of 2,289)) Emissions increased 18% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #48 of 2,289
- #2 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- +18.0% since 2011
Cms Energy vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
10,191,313 48th of 2289 higher than 2,241 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Cms Energy spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.84M MT).
You are here: Cms Energy.
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: Cms Energy, 8 facilities, 10.19M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent cms-energy · 2023 #48 · 10.2M MT
CO2E-LARGE · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-MULTI · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-UP · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-LARGE 10.2M MT
- TOP-DECILE #48/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Arclight Energy Partn… · Power Plants
- FAC-MULTI 8 facilities
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
- TREND-UP +18% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Arclight Energy Partners Fund Vii · Power Plants (±6K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.8% of 10.2M MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.2%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.8%
- 10.2M MT
- CH₄
- 0.1%
- 11K MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 8K MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Cms Energy
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Cms Energy - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Cms Energy's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Cms Energy - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 10.2M MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Cms Energy annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Cms Energy reported 10.2M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 8.6M MT in 2011 - a rise of 18.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (8)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Dearborn Industrial Generation Power Plants DEARBORN, MI | DEARBORN, MI | 3.3M |
| Covert Generating Station Power Plants COVERT, MI | COVERT, MI | 3.0M |
| Zeeland Generating Station Power Plants ZEELAND, MI | ZEELAND, MI | 2.2M |
| Jackson Generating Station Power Plants JACKSON, MI | JACKSON, MI | 892K |
| Dan E Karn Power Plants ESSEXVILLE, MI | ESSEXVILLE, MI | 720K |
| Kalamazoo River Generating Station Power Plants COMSTOCK, MI | COMSTOCK, MI | 125K |
| Consumers Energy - Ray Compressor Station Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Armada, MI | Armada, MI | 19K |
| Livingston Generating Station Power Plants GAYLORD, MI | GAYLORD, MI | 8K |
Cms Energy's reported CO₂e by EPA sector
Top sector Power Plants is 99.8% of this parent's facility CO₂e (7 sites) ; Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems follows at 0.2% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.
Cms Energy reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (10.2M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (10.2M MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (8 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (1.3M MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Cms Energy's emissions profile
- Cms Energy runs high-intensity per facility (1.3M MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
- It ranks #48 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.