EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants
CPN Management - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 43 facilities across 14 states (47.6M MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 47.6M
- Reporting facilities
- 43
- States covered
- 14
- Overall rank
- #4
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, CPN Management reported 47.6M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 43 facilities in 14 states (ranks in the top 1% of U.S. corporate GHG emitters (#4 of 2,289)) Emissions increased 38% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #4 of 2,289
- #3 in Power Plants
- +38.1% since 2011
CPN Management vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
47,584,534 4th of 2289 higher than 2,285 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How CPN Management spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 20 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 29.03M MT).
You are here: CPN Management.
Power Plants peer footprint table: CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent cpn-management · 2023 #4 · 47.6M MT
CO2E-LARGE · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-FLEET · SPAN-NATION · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-LARGE 47.6M MT
- TOP-DECILE #4/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Nextera Energy · Power Plants
- FAC-FLEET 43 facilities
- SPAN-NATION 14 states
- SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
- TREND-SURGE +38% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Nextera Energy · Power Plants (±2.0M MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 47.6M MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 47.5M MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 23K MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 30K MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around CPN Management
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
CPN Management - top sites (MT CO₂e)
CPN Management's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
CPN Management - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 47.6M MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
CPN Management annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
CPN Management reported 47.6M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 34.5M MT in 2011 - a rise of 38.1% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Wide facility book (43)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Deer Park Energy Center Power Plants DEER PARK, TX | DEER PARK, TX | 3.7M |
| York Energy Center Power Plants Delta, PA | Delta, PA | 3.6M |
| Guadalupe Generating Station Power Plants MARION, TX | MARION, TX | 2.9M |
| Freestone Power Generation Power Plants FAIRFIELD, TX | FAIRFIELD, TX | 2.9M |
| Bethlehem Power Plant Power Plants BETHLEHEM, PA | BETHLEHEM, PA | 2.6M |
| Morgan Energy Center Power Plants DECATUR, AL | DECATUR, AL | 2.2M |
| Channel Energy Center Power Plants PASADENA, TX | PASADENA, TX | 2.2M |
| Baytown Energy Center Power Plants BAYTOWN, TX | BAYTOWN, TX | 2.1M |
| Pasadena Power Plant Power Plants PASADENA, TX | PASADENA, TX | 1.9M |
| Bosque County Power Plant Power Plants Laguna Park, TX | Laguna Park, TX | 1.8M |
| Pastoria Energy Facility Power Plants LEBEC, CA | LEBEC, CA | 1.8M |
| Delta Energy Center, LLC Power Plants PITTSBURG, CA | PITTSBURG, CA | 1.6M |
| Hermiston Power, LLC Power Plants HERMISTON, OR | HERMISTON, OR | 1.6M |
| Corpus Christi Energy Center Power Plants CORPUS CHRISTI, TX | CORPUS CHRISTI, TX | 1.4M |
| Brazos Valley Energy, LP Power Plants THOMPSONS, TX | THOMPSONS, TX | 1.3M |
| Granite Ridge Energy Power Plants LONDONDERRY, NH | LONDONDERRY, NH | 1.3M |
| Los Medanos Energy Center, LLC Power Plants PITTSBURG, CA | PITTSBURG, CA | 1.3M |
| Texas City Cogeneration Power Plants TEXAS CITY, TX | TEXAS CITY, TX | 1.2M |
| Magic Valley Generating Station Power Plants EDINBURG, TX | EDINBURG, TX | 1.1M |
| South Point Energy Center, LLC Power Plants MOHAVE VALLEY, AZ | MOHAVE VALLEY, AZ | 1.1M |
| Metcalf Energy Center Power Plants Coyote, CA | Coyote, CA | 930K |
| Hay Road Power Plants WILMINGTON, DE | WILMINGTON, DE | 914K |
| Fore River Energy Center Power Plants WEYMOUTH, MA | WEYMOUTH, MA | 886K |
| Westbrook Energy Center Power Plants WESTBROOK, ME | WESTBROOK, ME | 871K |
| Calpine Sutter Energy Center Power Plants YUBA CITY, CA | YUBA CITY, CA | 841K |
| Otay Mesa Energy Center, LLC Power Plants SAN DIEGO, CA | SAN DIEGO, CA | 839K |
| Russell City Energy Company LLC Power Plants Hayward, CA | Hayward, CA | 717K |
| Pine Bluff Energy Center Power Plants PINE BLUFF, AR | PINE BLUFF, AR | 676K |
| Bethpage Energy Center Power Plants HICKSVILLE, NY | HICKSVILLE, NY | 315K |
| KIAC Cogeneration Power Plants JAMAICA, NY | JAMAICA, NY | 224K |
| Zion Energy Center Power Plants ZION, IL | ZION, IL | 189K |
| Nissequogue Cogen Power Plants STONY BROOK, NY | STONY BROOK, NY | 170K |
| Edge Moor Power Plants WILMINGTON, DE | WILMINGTON, DE | 167K |
| Los Esteros Critical Energy Fac Power Plants SAN JOSE, CA | SAN JOSE, CA | 88K |
| Cumberland Energy Center Power Plants MILLVILLE, NJ | MILLVILLE, NJ | 37K |
| Calpine King City Cogen, LLC Power Plants King City, CA | King City, CA | 30K |
| Calpine Gilroy Cogen, LP Power Plants GILROY, CA | GILROY, CA | 29K |
| Feather River Energy Center Power Plants YUBA CITY, CA | YUBA CITY, CA | 29K |
| Yuba City Energy Center Power Plants YUBA CITY, CA | YUBA CITY, CA | 29K |
| Sherman Avenue Power Plants VINELAND, NJ | VINELAND, NJ | 24K |
| Gilroy Energy Center, LLC Power Plants GILROY, CA | GILROY, CA | 15K |
| Gilroy Energy Center, LLC for King City Power Plants KING CITY, CA | KING CITY, CA | 7K |
| Carlls Corner Energy Center Power Plants UPPER DEERFIELD TWP, NJ | UPPER DEERFIELD TWP, NJ | 4K |
Where CPN Management's reported CO₂e sits by state
47.1% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Texas (11 sites) ; next is California at 17.4% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
CPN Management reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (47.6M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (47.6M MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (43 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (1.1M MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using CPN Management's emissions profile
- CPN Management runs high-intensity per facility (1.1M MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
- It ranks #4 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.