Cumberland Energy Center
MILLVILLE, NJ · Cumberland · NAICS 221112
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, Cumberland Energy Center ranks #5,082 of 8,713 U.S. reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e and #52 of 120 facilities in NJ.
- National rank #5,082 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #52 of 120 in NJ
- #1,199 of 1,732 in Power Plants
- 0.1% of CPN MANAGEMENT parent CO₂e
- 2023 mix: 0.1% non-CO₂ (N₂O-led)
- +5.0% since 2011
Cumberland Energy Center vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
36,948 5082nd of 8713 higher than 3,631 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
Facility footprint context
This site accounts for 0.1% of CPN MANAGEMENT reported parent CO₂e (37K MT of 47.6M MT ; #35 of 43 GHGRP facilities under that parent ). Inside the EPA Power Plants sector it ranks #1,199 of 1,732 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
2023 gas mix desk
Of 37K MT CO₂e reported for 2023, non-CO₂ gases are 0.1% , led by N₂O at 0.1% . Component shares use this facility's GHGRP CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year (already CO₂e-weighted).
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 37K MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 17 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 21 MT
Annual emissions history
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 36,948 |
| 2022 | 53,699 |
| 2021 | 31,748 |
| 2020 | 34,296 |
| 2019 | 45,840 |
| 2018 | 102,050 |
| 2017 | 85,793 |
| 2016 | 60,248 |
| 2015 | 55,303 |
| 2014 | 62,699 |
| 2013 | 43,631 |
| 2012 | 30,623 |
| 2011 | 35,190 |
Facility insight: Cumberland Energy Center
Cumberland Energy Center (EPA GHGRP Facility ID 1006939) reported 37K metric tons of CO2-equivalent in 2023, operating in MILLVILLE, NJ within Cumberland. Among GHGRP reporters it ranks #5,082 of 8,713 nationally by latest CO₂e and #52 of 120 in NJ. The site is classified under Power Plants with NAICS code 221112.
Over 13 years (2011–2023), emissions stayed within a narrow band around 37K MT CO₂e (peak 102K MT). This facility has filed every year from 2011 to 2023, a complete 13-year record.
Peak year was 2018 at 102K MT CO2e; latest 2023 sits 63.8% below that peak (37K MT). The largest year-to-year move was 2018→2019 (-55.1%, 56K MT).
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does Cumberland Energy Center rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, Cumberland Energy Center ranks #5,082 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #52 of 120 facilities in NJ (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than Cumberland Energy Center? ▼
Cumberland Energy Center's 37K MT CO₂e is higher than 3,631 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (42%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does Cumberland Energy Center emit? ▼
Cumberland Energy Center reported 37K MT CO2e in 2023.
What share of CPN MANAGEMENT does Cumberland Energy Center represent? ▼
Cumberland Energy Center accounts for 0.1% of CPN MANAGEMENT's reported GHGRP CO₂e (37K MT of 47.6M MT), ranking #35 of 43 facilities under that parent.
What is Cumberland Energy Center's 2023 CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O mix? ▼
In 2023, non-CO₂ gases were 0.1% of reported CO₂e at Cumberland Energy Center, with N₂O the larger non-CO₂ share at 0.1% (CO₂ 99.9%). Shares use the facility's GHGRP gas components for that year.
Where does Cumberland Energy Center rank inside Power Plants? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Power Plants, Cumberland Energy Center ranks #1,199 of 1,732 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is Cumberland Energy Center reducing emissions? ▼
Over 13 reporting years (2011–2023), Cumberland Energy Center's emissions have increased by 5%. Emissions have remained relatively stable.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Two GHGRP-derived peer sets for Cumberland Energy Center, both outside NJ so the neighborhoods are not state-geo containment.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside NJ (37K MT here).
Similar Power Plants CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside NJ.