EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Other

Darling Ingredients - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 14 facilities across 12 states (509K MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
509K
Reporting facilities
14
States covered
12
Overall rank
#462
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

509K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Darling Ingredients reported 509K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 14 facilities in 12 states (ranks #462 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 131% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #462 of 2,289
  • #46 in Other
  • +131.2% since 2011

Darling Ingredients vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

509,078 462nd of 2289 higher than 1,827 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Darling Ingredients spreads its footprint vs Other peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Other companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 2.28M MT).

Median split: 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO₂e among Other peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 0204060 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Other
Median split: 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO₂e among Other peers.

You are here: Darling Ingredients.

Other peer footprint table: Darling Ingredients, 14 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. Prairie State Energy Campus Management, 1 facilities, 11.46M MT CO2e. Marathon Petroleum, 4 facilities, 7.11M MT CO2e. Archer Daniels Midland, 15 facilities, 6.67M MT CO2e. Consol Energy, 4 facilities, 6.53M MT CO2e. American Consolidated Natural Resources, 6 facilities, 6.29M MT CO2e. Hummel Station, 1 facilities, 2.91M MT CO2e. Arch Resources, 5 facilities, 2.83M MT CO2e. US Government, 51 facilities, 2.78M MT CO2e. Poet, 28 facilities, 2.66M MT CO2e. Cargill, 27 facilities, 2.51M MT CO2e. Alliance Holdings Gp, 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO2e. Valero Energy, 12 facilities, 2.24M MT CO2e. Tyson Foods, 31 facilities, 1.72M MT CO2e. Iron Senergy Holding, 1 facilities, 1.64M MT CO2e. Karnavati Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. Hatfield Metallurgical Intermediate Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.38M MT CO2e. Alpha Metallurgical Resources, 9 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e. Hallador Energy, 2 facilities, 1.32M MT CO2e. Green Plains, 11 facilities, 1.3M MT CO2e. Coronado Group, 3 facilities, 1.28M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent darling-ingredients · 2023 #462 · 509K MT

CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-MULTI · SPAN-NATION · SECTOR-OTHER · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 509K MT
  • UPPER-Q #462/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Pratt Industries · Pulp and Paper
  • FAC-MULTI 14 facilities
  • SPAN-NATION 12 states
  • SECTOR-OTHER Other
  • TREND-SURGE +131% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Pratt Industries · Pulp and Paper (±149 MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 methane-weighted parent mix

Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Darling Ingredients: CH₄ is 14.1% of 509K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0.1%). Non-CO₂ gases total 14.2%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
85.8%
437K MT
CH₄
14.1%
72K MT
N₂O
0.1%
276 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Darling Ingredients

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MSkanon Investments · Mineral…510KDarling Ingredients · Other …509KPratt Industries · Pulp and …509KCity of Baton Rouge L… · Was…509KJba USA Holdings · Other · n…509KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Darling Ingredients · May 2026

Largest sites in a top-third parent book

Darling Ingredients - top sites (MT CO₂e)

Darling In, Ingredients - Fa…69KDarling Ingredients Inc.62KDarling Ingredients, Inc. - …47KDarling Ingredients Inc.43KDarling Ingredients, Inc. - …40KDiamond Green Diesel, LLC35KDarling Ingredients Inc.32KDarling Ingredients Inc.32K

Darling Ingredients's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Emissions growth across reporting years

Darling Ingredients - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
509K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.2M0.3M0.4M0.5M0.6M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.51M

Darling Ingredients annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Darling Ingredients reported 509K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 220K MT in 2011 - a rise of 131.2% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Wide facility book (14)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Darling In, Ingredients - Fayetteville
Other
Fayetteville, NC
69K
Darling Ingredients Inc.
Other
Jackson, MS
62K
Darling Ingredients, Inc. - Linkwood
Other
Linkwood, MD
47K
Darling Ingredients Inc.
Other
Union City, TN
43K
Darling Ingredients, Inc. - Rose Hill
Other
Rose Hill, NC
40K
Diamond Green Diesel, LLC
Chemicals
Norco, LA
35K
Darling Ingredients Inc.
Other
East DUBLIN, GA
32K
Darling Ingredients Inc.
Other
Butler, KY
32K
Darling Ingredients, Inc. - Wadesboro
Other
Wadesboro, NC
31K
Darling Ingredients Inc.
Other
Pocahontas, AR
30K
Darling Ingredients Inc.
Other
Bastrop, TX
27K
Darling Ingredients Inc. - Wahoo
Other
Wahoo, NE
27K
Darling Ingredients Inc
Other
Los Angeles, CA
25K
Darling Ingredients, Inc. - Ward
Other
Ward, SC
8K

Where Darling Ingredients's reported CO₂e sits by state

27.6% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in North Carolina (3 sites) ; next is Mississippi at 12.2% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.

NC140KMS62KMD47KTN43KLA35KGA32KKY32KAR30K
EPA GHGRP · Darling Ingredients facility CO₂e by state · May 2026

Darling Ingredients reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Darling Ingredients's reported CO₂e by EPA sector

Top sector Other is 93.2% of this parent's facility CO₂e (13 sites) ; Chemicals follows at 6.8% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.

Other474KChemicals35K
EPA GHGRP · Darling Ingredients facility CO₂e by sector · May 2026

Darling Ingredients reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (509K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Darling Ingredients's emissions profile

  • Darling Ingredients runs low-intensity per facility (36K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Other sector on the Other industry page.
  • It ranks #462 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Other emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.