EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Pulp and Paper
Pratt Industries - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 5 facilities across 5 states (509K MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 509K
- Reporting facilities
- 5
- States covered
- 5
- Overall rank
- #463
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Pratt Industries reported 509K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 5 facilities in 5 states (ranks #463 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 135% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #463 of 2,289
- #12 in Pulp and Paper
- +135.1% since 2011
Pratt Industries vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
508,929 463rd of 2289 higher than 1,826 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Pratt Industries spreads its footprint vs Pulp and Paper peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 20 Pulp and Paper companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (4 facilities, 0.65M MT).
You are here: Pratt Industries.
Pulp and Paper peer footprint table: Pratt Industries, 5 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. Koch Industries, 20 facilities, 6.32M MT CO2e. Westrock, 24 facilities, 5.74M MT CO2e. International Paper, 21 facilities, 5.08M MT CO2e. Graphic Packaging Holding, 6 facilities, 1.52M MT CO2e. The Procter & Gamble, 6 facilities, 1.51M MT CO2e. Packaging CORP of America, 8 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Domtar, 7 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Kimberly-Clark, 8 facilities, 1.03M MT CO2e. Nd Paper, 4 facilities, 0.77M MT CO2e. Billerud Americas, 3 facilities, 0.65M MT CO2e. Clearwater Paper, 4 facilities, 0.65M MT CO2e. Ahlstrom-Munksjo North America Specialty Solutions, 4 facilities, 0.59M MT CO2e. Sappi North America, 3 facilities, 0.52M MT CO2e. Sylvamo North America, 2 facilities, 0.49M MT CO2e. New-Indy Jv, 2 facilities, 0.47M MT CO2e. Hig Capital, 1 facilities, 0.46M MT CO2e. Pixelle Specialty Solutions, 3 facilities, 0.43M MT CO2e. Evergreen Packaging Group Holdings, 1 facilities, 0.4M MT CO2e. Nippon Paper Industries CO, 1 facilities, 0.38M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent pratt-industries · 2023 #463 · 509K MT
CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-MULTI · SECTOR-PULP-AND-PAP · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 509K MT
- UPPER-Q #463/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH City of Baton Rouge L… · Waste
- FAC-PAIR 5 facilities
- SPAN-MULTI 5 states
- SECTOR-PULP-AND-PAP Pulp and Paper
- TREND-SURGE +135% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: City of Baton Rouge Louisiana · Waste (±6 MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.4% of 509K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.6%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.4%
- 506K MT
- CH₄
- 0.1%
- 577 MT
- N₂O
- 0.4%
- 2K MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Pratt Industries
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Pratt Industries - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Pratt Industries's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Pratt Industries - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 509K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Pratt Industries annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Pratt Industries reported 509K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 217K MT in 2011 - a rise of 135.1% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (5)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Pratt Paper (OH) LLC Pulp and Paper Wapakoneta, OH | Wapakoneta, OH | 125K |
| Pratt Paper (IN) LLC Pulp and Paper Valparaiso, IN | Valparaiso, IN | 107K |
| Pratt Industries Pulp and Paper Shreveport, LA | Shreveport, LA | 106K |
| PRATT PAPER (NY), INC. Pulp and Paper STATEN ISLAND, NY | STATEN ISLAND, NY | 90K |
| PRATT INDUSTRIES MILL DIV CONYERS Pulp and Paper CONYERS, GA | CONYERS, GA | 82K |
Where Pratt Industries's reported CO₂e sits by state
24.5% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Ohio (1 site) ; next is Indiana at 21% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Pratt Industries reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (509K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (509K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (5 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (102K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Pratt Industries's emissions profile
- Pratt Industries runs mid-intensity per facility (102K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Pulp and Paper sector on the Pulp and Paper industry page.
- It ranks #463 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Pulp and Paper emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.