EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Metals

Eb Holdings II - declining reported GHG

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 2 reporting facilities in 2 states.

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
122K
Reporting facilities
2
States covered
2
Overall rank
#962
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

122K MT CO₂e · 2023

Eb Holdings II reported emissions fell 10.9% since 2011 to 122K MT CO₂e in 2023.

  • Overall rank #962 of 2,289
  • #53 in Metals
  • -10.9% since 2011

Eb Holdings II vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

121,532 962nd of 2289 higher than 1,327 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Eb Holdings II spreads its footprint vs Metals peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Metals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (3 facilities, 0.8M MT).

Median split: 3 facilities, 0.8M MT CO₂e among Metals peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 0102030 0M10M20M30M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Metals
Median split: 3 facilities, 0.8M MT CO₂e among Metals peers.

You are here: Eb Holdings II.

Metals peer footprint table: Eb Holdings II, 2 facilities, 0.12M MT CO2e. Cleveland-Cliffs, 26 facilities, 27.37M MT CO2e. US Steel, 13 facilities, 19.41M MT CO2e. Nucor, 24 facilities, 5.57M MT CO2e. Alcoa, 3 facilities, 5.16M MT CO2e. Suncoke Energy, 5 facilities, 3.27M MT CO2e. Steel Dynamics, 10 facilities, 2.54M MT CO2e. Century Aluminum, 3 facilities, 0.99M MT CO2e. Globe Specialty Metals, 4 facilities, 0.92M MT CO2e. Commercial Metals, 8 facilities, 0.86M MT CO2e. Gerdau USA, 9 facilities, 0.84M MT CO2e. Gramercy Holdings I, 1 facilities, 0.8M MT CO2e. Ssab US Holding, 2 facilities, 0.63M MT CO2e. Novelis, 6 facilities, 0.63M MT CO2e. Arconic, 4 facilities, 0.63M MT CO2e. Arcelormittal Holdings, 2 facilities, 0.62M MT CO2e. Am/ns Calvert, 1 facilities, 0.56M MT CO2e. Bluescope Steel Investments, 1 facilities, 0.44M MT CO2e. Pinnacle Mountain Holding Co III, 1 facilities, 0.38M MT CO2e. Proterial America, 2 facilities, 0.38M MT CO2e. Magnitude 7 Metals, 1 facilities, 0.38M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent eb-holdings-ii · 2023 #962 · 122K MT

CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-METALS · TREND-DOWN · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 122K MT
  • MID-PACK #962/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Worcester County Depa… · Waste
  • FAC-PAIR 2 facilities
  • SPAN-PAIR 2 states
  • SECTOR-METALS Metals
  • TREND-DOWN −11% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Worcester County Department of Public Works · Waste (±163 MT)

Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (100% of 122K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
100%
121K MT
CH₄
0%
16 MT
N₂O
0%
19 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Eb Holdings II

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MSan Joaquin Refining… · Chem…122KSouthern Illinois Uni… · Oth…122KUniversity of Rochest… · Oth…122KWorcester County Depa… · Was…122KEb Holdings II · Metals · th…122KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Eb Holdings II · May 2026

Largest facilities by reported emissions

Eb Holdings II - top facilities (MT CO₂e)

QUEMETCO INC66KQuemetco, Inc.56K

Eb Holdings II's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Emissions decline across reporting years

Eb Holdings II - declining annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
122K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.08M0.1M0.12M0.14M0.16M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.12M

Eb Holdings II annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Eb Holdings II reported 122K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 136K MT in 2011 - a decline of 10.9% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (2)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
QUEMETCO INC
Metals
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
66K
Quemetco, Inc.
Metals
City of Industry, CA
56K

Where Eb Holdings II's reported CO₂e sits by state

54.1% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Indiana (1 site) ; next is California at 45.9% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.

IN66KCA56K
EPA GHGRP · Eb Holdings II facility CO₂e by state · May 2026

Eb Holdings II reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles

Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Eb Holdings II. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Metals browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Eb Holdings II's emissions profile

  • Eb Holdings II runs mid-intensity per facility (61K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Metals sector on the Metals industry page.
  • It ranks #962 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Metals emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.