EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Chemicals
San Joaquin Refining CO - rising reported GHG
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 2 reporting facilities in 1 state.
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 122K
- Reporting facilities
- 2
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #958
Data updated May 2026
San Joaquin Refining CO reported emissions rose 31.7% since 2011 to 122K MT CO₂e in 2023.
- Overall rank #958 of 2,289
- #79 in Chemicals
- +31.7% since 2011
San Joaquin Refining CO vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
122,036 958th of 2289 higher than 1,331 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How San Joaquin Refining CO spreads its footprint vs Chemicals peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Chemicals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (7 facilities, 7.4M MT).
You are here: San Joaquin Refining CO.
Chemicals peer footprint table: San Joaquin Refining CO, 2 facilities, 0.12M MT CO2e. Exxon Mobil, 4 facilities, 26.19M MT CO2e. Cf Industries Holdings, 6 facilities, 20.58M MT CO2e. Chevron, 8 facilities, 16.31M MT CO2e. Phillips 66, 9 facilities, 15.35M MT CO2e. Air Products & Chemicals, 27 facilities, 14.07M MT CO2e. Valero Energy, 7 facilities, 13.11M MT CO2e. Dow, 9 facilities, 12.33M MT CO2e. Koch Industries, 9 facilities, 11.58M MT CO2e. Marathon Petroleum, 6 facilities, 9M MT CO2e. Linde, 18 facilities, 8.79M MT CO2e. Bp America, 2 facilities, 7.4M MT CO2e. Lyondellbasell Industries, 9 facilities, 6.91M MT CO2e. Shell Petroleum, 4 facilities, 6.83M MT CO2e. American Air Liquide Holdings, 12 facilities, 6.17M MT CO2e. Eastman Chemical, 6 facilities, 6.04M MT CO2e. Formosa Plastics CORP USA, 2 facilities, 5.61M MT CO2e. Nutrien US Topco, 4 facilities, 4.67M MT CO2e. Westlake Chemical, 7 facilities, 4.44M MT CO2e. Basf, 8 facilities, 3.79M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 7 facilities, 3.5M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent san-joaquin-refining-co · 2023 #958 · 122K MT
CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-CHEMICALS · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 122K MT
- MID-PACK #958/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Southern Illinois Uni… · Other
- FAC-PAIR 2 facilities
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-CHEMICALS Chemicals
- TREND-SURGE +32% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Southern Illinois University System · Other (±207 MT)
Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.3% of 122K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.7%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.3%
- 121K MT
- CH₄
- 0.6%
- 783 MT
- N₂O
- 0%
- 59 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around San Joaquin Refining CO
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest facilities by reported emissions
San Joaquin Refining CO - top facilities (MT CO₂e)
San Joaquin Refining CO's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
San Joaquin Refining CO - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 122K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
San Joaquin Refining CO annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
San Joaquin Refining CO reported 122K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 93K MT in 2011 - a rise of 31.7% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Facilities (2)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| SAN JOAQUIN REFINING CO INC Chemicals BAKERSFIELD, CA | BAKERSFIELD, CA | 87K |
| TRICOR REFINING LLC Refineries BAKERSFIELD, CA | BAKERSFIELD, CA | 35K |
San Joaquin Refining CO's reported CO₂e by EPA sector
Top sector Chemicals is 71.2% of this parent's facility CO₂e (1 site) ; Refineries follows at 28.8% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.
San Joaquin Refining CO reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector
Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles
Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for San Joaquin Refining CO. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Chemicals browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (122K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (2 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (61K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using San Joaquin Refining CO's emissions profile
- San Joaquin Refining CO runs mid-intensity per facility (61K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Chemicals sector on the Chemicals industry page.
- It ranks #958 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Chemicals emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.