EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Equitrans Midstream - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 6 facilities across 3 states (302K MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 302K
- Reporting facilities
- 6
- States covered
- 3
- Overall rank
- #609
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Equitrans Midstream reported 302K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 6 facilities in 3 states (ranks #609 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 745% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #609 of 2,289
- #49 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- +745.2% since 2013
Equitrans Midstream vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
301,685 609th of 2289 higher than 1,680 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Equitrans Midstream spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).
You are here: Equitrans Midstream.
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: Equitrans Midstream, 6 facilities, 0.3M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent equitrans-midstream · 2023 #609 · 302K MT
CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 302K MT
- MID-PACK #609/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Micron Technology · Other
- FAC-PAIR 6 facilities
- SPAN-PAIR 3 states
- SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
- TREND-SURGE +745% since 2013
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Micron Technology · Other (±2K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 methane-weighted parent mix
Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Equitrans Midstream: CH₄ is 6.9% of 252K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0.1%). Non-CO₂ gases total 7%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 93%
- 235K MT
- CH₄
- 6.9%
- 18K MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 132 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Equitrans Midstream
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Equitrans Midstream - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Equitrans Midstream's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Equitrans Midstream - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2013–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 252K MT
- 11 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Equitrans Midstream annual reported GHG emissions, 2013–2023
Equitrans Midstream reported 252K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 30K MT in 2013 - a rise of 745.2% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (6)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Plasma Compressor Station Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Clarington, OH | Clarington, OH | 75K |
| Jefferson Compressor Station Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Jefferson, PA | Jefferson, PA | 54K |
| Eureka Midstream, LLC Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Marietta, OH | Marietta, OH | 49K |
| Redhook Compressor Station Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Waynesburg, PA | Waynesburg, PA | 47K |
| Corona Compressor Station Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Smithfield, WV | Smithfield, WV | 39K |
| Blacksville Compressor Station Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Blacksville, WV | Blacksville, WV | 37K |
Where Equitrans Midstream's reported CO₂e sits by state
41.4% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Ohio (2 sites) ; next is Pennsylvania at 33.3% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Equitrans Midstream reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (302K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (302K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (6 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (50K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Equitrans Midstream's emissions profile
- Equitrans Midstream runs mid-intensity per facility (50K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
- It ranks #609 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.