EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Other
Exxon Mobil - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 24 facilities across 6 states (34.3M MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 34.3M
- Reporting facilities
- 24
- States covered
- 6
- Overall rank
- #9
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Exxon Mobil reported 34.3M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 24 facilities in 6 states (ranks in the top 1% of U.S. corporate GHG emitters (#9 of 2,289)) Emissions increased 11% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #9 of 2,289
- #2 in Other
- +10.7% since 2011
Exxon Mobil vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
34,301,326 9th of 2289 higher than 2,280 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Exxon Mobil spreads its footprint vs Other peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Other companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 2.51M MT).
You are here: Exxon Mobil.
Other peer footprint table: Exxon Mobil, 24 facilities, 34.3M MT CO2e. Prairie State Energy Campus Management, 1 facilities, 11.46M MT CO2e. Marathon Petroleum, 4 facilities, 7.11M MT CO2e. Archer Daniels Midland, 15 facilities, 6.67M MT CO2e. Consol Energy, 4 facilities, 6.53M MT CO2e. American Consolidated Natural Resources, 6 facilities, 6.29M MT CO2e. Hummel Station, 1 facilities, 2.91M MT CO2e. Arch Resources, 5 facilities, 2.83M MT CO2e. US Government, 51 facilities, 2.78M MT CO2e. Poet, 28 facilities, 2.66M MT CO2e. Cargill, 27 facilities, 2.51M MT CO2e. Alliance Holdings Gp, 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO2e. Valero Energy, 12 facilities, 2.24M MT CO2e. Tyson Foods, 31 facilities, 1.72M MT CO2e. Iron Senergy Holding, 1 facilities, 1.64M MT CO2e. Karnavati Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. Hatfield Metallurgical Intermediate Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.38M MT CO2e. Alpha Metallurgical Resources, 9 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e. Hallador Energy, 2 facilities, 1.32M MT CO2e. Green Plains, 11 facilities, 1.3M MT CO2e. Coronado Group, 3 facilities, 1.28M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent exxon-mobil · 2023 #9 · 34.3M MT
CO2E-LARGE · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-MULTI · SPAN-MULTI · SECTOR-OTHER · TREND-UP · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-LARGE 34.3M MT
- TOP-DECILE #9/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Entergy · Power Plants
- FAC-MULTI 24 facilities
- SPAN-MULTI 6 states
- SECTOR-OTHER Other
- TREND-UP +11% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Entergy · Power Plants (±384K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.4% of 34.3M MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.6%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.4%
- 34.1M MT
- CH₄
- 0.4%
- 144K MT
- N₂O
- 0.2%
- 75K MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Exxon Mobil
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Exxon Mobil - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Exxon Mobil's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Exxon Mobil - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 34.3M MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Exxon Mobil annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Exxon Mobil reported 34.3M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 31.0M MT in 2011 - a rise of 10.7% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Wide facility book (24)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| EXXONMOBIL Bt Site Chemicals BAYTOWN, TX | BAYTOWN, TX | 12.7M |
| Exxonmobil Beaumont Refinery Chemicals BEAUMONT, TX | BEAUMONT, TX | 6.0M |
| EXXONMOBIL BATON ROUGE REFINERY AND CHEMICAL PLANT Chemicals BATON ROUGE, LA | BATON ROUGE, LA | 5.9M |
| Shute Creek Facility Injection of CO2 KEMMERER, WY | KEMMERER, WY | 3.2M |
| EXXONMOBIL OIL JOLIET REFINERY Petroleum Product Suppliers CHANNAHON, IL | CHANNAHON, IL | 2.6M |
| Gulf Coast Growth Ventures LLC Chemicals Gregory, TX | Gregory, TX | 1.6M |
| ConocoPhillips Alaska Inc - KRU CPF1 Petroleum Product Suppliers North Slope, AK | North Slope, AK | 493K |
| ConocoPhillips Alaska Inc - KRU CPF3 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems North Slope, AK | North Slope, AK | 337K |
| Thunder Horse, MMS Platform ID 02481, Complex ID 1101-1 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Offshore, LA | Offshore, LA | 251K |
| Walker Ridge 718 (JSM) Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Offshore, LA | Offshore, LA | 195K |
| EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL CO - BATON ROUGE POLYOLEFINS PLANT Other BATON ROUGE, LA | BATON ROUGE, LA | 135K |
| PHP Junction Compressor Station Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems McKavett, TX | McKavett, TX | 128K |
| EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL MONT BELVIEU PLASTICS PLANT Other MONT BELVIEU, TX | MONT BELVIEU, TX | 93K |
| Hoover Diana Platform (AC25-HA) Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Offshore, TX | Offshore, TX | 86K |
| XTO - Cotton Valley Gas Plant Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers Cotton Valley, LA | Cotton Valley, LA | 85K |
| Hawkins Gas Plant Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems HAWKINS, TX | HAWKINS, TX | 82K |
| Port Allen Complex Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers Port Allen, LA | Port Allen, LA | 78K |
| ConocoPhillips Alaska Inc - KRU STP Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems North Slope, AK | North Slope, AK | 78K |
| EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL CO - BATON ROUGE PLASTICS PLANT Other BATON ROUGE, LA | BATON ROUGE, LA | 74K |
| Cowboy CDP Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Malaga, NM | Malaga, NM | 73K |
| BEAUMONT POLYETHYLENE PLANT Other BEAUMONT, TX | BEAUMONT, TX | 69K |
| XTO - New Teague Plant Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Teague, TX | Teague, TX | 42K |
| XTO - Farrar Plant Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Jewett, TX | Jewett, TX | 35K |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation-Baton Rouge Resin Finishing Plant Other Baton Rouge, LA | Baton Rouge, LA | 24K |
Where Exxon Mobil's reported CO₂e sits by state
60.7% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Texas (10 sites) ; next is Louisiana at 19.7% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Exxon Mobil reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Exxon Mobil's reported CO₂e by EPA sector
Top sector Chemicals is 76.3% of this parent's facility CO₂e (4 sites) ; Injection of CO2 follows at 9.2% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.
Exxon Mobil reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (34.3M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (34.3M MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (24 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (1.4M MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Exxon Mobil's emissions profile
- Exxon Mobil runs high-intensity per facility (1.4M MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Other sector on the Other industry page.
- It ranks #9 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Other emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.