EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers
Harvest Pipeline - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 2 facilities across 2 states (1.3M MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 1.3M
- Reporting facilities
- 2
- States covered
- 2
- Overall rank
- #290
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Harvest Pipeline reported 1.3M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 2 facilities in 2 states (ranks #290 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 20% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #290 of 2,289
- #5 in Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers
- -19.8% since 2011
Harvest Pipeline vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
1,260,219 290th of 2289 higher than 1,999 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Harvest Pipeline spreads its footprint vs Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 20 Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (3 facilities, 0.6M MT).
You are here: Harvest Pipeline.
Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers peer footprint table: Harvest Pipeline, 2 facilities, 1.26M MT CO2e. Mplx, 11 facilities, 1.46M MT CO2e. California Resources, 2 facilities, 1.34M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 10 facilities, 1.33M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 3 facilities, 1.16M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 5 facilities, 0.99M MT CO2e. Oneok, 4 facilities, 0.99M MT CO2e. Phillips 66, 3 facilities, 0.71M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 5 facilities, 0.63M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 4 facilities, 0.6M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 4 facilities, 0.58M MT CO2e. Western Midstream Partners, 3 facilities, 0.45M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 5 facilities, 0.39M MT CO2e. Aux Sable Liquid Products, 1 facilities, 0.29M MT CO2e. Carol Broadbent Farver, 1 facilities, 0.25M MT CO2e. Hess, 1 facilities, 0.24M MT CO2e. Spectra Energy, 1 facilities, 0.23M MT CO2e. Marathon Petroleum, 3 facilities, 0.21M MT CO2e. Epic Midstream, 2 facilities, 0.19M MT CO2e. Dow, 1 facilities, 0.19M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent harvest-pipeline · 2023 #290 · 1.3M MT
CO2E-MID · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-NATURAL-GAS- · TREND-DOWN · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MID 1.3M MT
- UPPER-Q #290/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Delta Air Lines · Other
- FAC-PAIR 2 facilities
- SPAN-PAIR 2 states
- SECTOR-NATURAL-GAS- Natural Gas and N…
- TREND-DOWN −20% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Delta Air Lines · Other (±4K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (98.6% of 1.3M MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 1.4%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 98.6%
- 1.2M MT
- CH₄
- 1.4%
- 17K MT
- N₂O
- 0%
- 352 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Harvest Pipeline
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Harvest Pipeline - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Harvest Pipeline's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions decline across reporting years
Harvest Pipeline - declining annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 1.3M MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Harvest Pipeline annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Harvest Pipeline reported 1.3M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 1.6M MT in 2011 - a decline of 19.8% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Facilities (2)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Milagro Gas Plant Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems BLOOMFIELD, NM | BLOOMFIELD, NM | 857K |
| Ignacio Gas Plant Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers Durango, CO | Durango, CO | 404K |
Where Harvest Pipeline's reported CO₂e sits by state
68% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in New Mexico (1 site) ; next is Colorado at 32% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Harvest Pipeline reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Harvest Pipeline's reported CO₂e by EPA sector
Top sector Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems is 68% of this parent's facility CO₂e (1 site) ; Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers follows at 32% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.
Harvest Pipeline reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (1.3M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (1.3M MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (2 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (630K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Harvest Pipeline's emissions profile
- Harvest Pipeline runs high-intensity per facility (630K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers sector on the Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers industry page.
- It ranks #290 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.