EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Minerals
Crh Americas - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 7 facilities across 7 states (4.4M MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 4.4M
- Reporting facilities
- 7
- States covered
- 7
- Overall rank
- #122
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Crh Americas reported 4.4M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 7 facilities in 7 states (ranks among the top 10% of U.S. corporate GHG emitters (#122 of 2,289)) Emissions increased 16% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #122 of 2,289
- #8 in Minerals
- +15.9% since 2011
Crh Americas vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
4,368,914 122nd of 2289 higher than 2,167 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Crh Americas spreads its footprint vs Minerals peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 20 Minerals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 3.71M MT).
You are here: Crh Americas.
Minerals peer footprint table: Crh Americas, 7 facilities, 4.37M MT CO2e. Holcim Participations (us), 12 facilities, 11.04M MT CO2e. Eagle Materials, 13 facilities, 5.84M MT CO2e. Rc Lonestar, 7 facilities, 5.59M MT CO2e. Lhoist North America, 10 facilities, 5.45M MT CO2e. Cemex, 7 facilities, 5.39M MT CO2e. Heidelberg Materials US Cement, 6 facilities, 4.17M MT CO2e. Carmeuse Lime, 10 facilities, 4.13M MT CO2e. Martin Marietta Materials, 4 facilities, 4M MT CO2e. Graymont, 9 facilities, 3.71M MT CO2e. Taiheiyo Cement USA, 4 facilities, 3.57M MT CO2e. Hbm Holdings, 4 facilities, 3.45M MT CO2e. Argos USA, 4 facilities, 3.33M MT CO2e. Gcc of America, 5 facilities, 2.29M MT CO2e. Titan America, 2 facilities, 1.85M MT CO2e. Genesis Energy, 1 facilities, 1.82M MT CO2e. American Crystal Sugar, 5 facilities, 1.8M MT CO2e. National Cement CO, 2 facilities, 1.58M MT CO2e. Tata Chemicals Soda Ash Partners, 1 facilities, 1.54M MT CO2e. Votorantim Cimentos North America, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent crh-americas · 2023 #122 · 4.4M MT
CO2E-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-MULTI · SECTOR-MINERALS · TREND-UP · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MID 4.4M MT
- TOP-DECILE #122/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Cooperative Energy a… · Power Plants
- FAC-PAIR 7 facilities
- SPAN-MULTI 7 states
- SECTOR-MINERALS Minerals
- TREND-UP +16% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Cooperative Energy a Mississippi Electric Cooperative · Power Plants (±42K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.8% of 4.4M MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.2%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.8%
- 4.4M MT
- CH₄
- 0.1%
- 3K MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 5K MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Crh Americas
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Crh Americas - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Crh Americas's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Crh Americas - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 4.4M MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Crh Americas annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Crh Americas reported 4.4M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 3.8M MT in 2011 - a rise of 15.9% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (7)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| ASH GROVE CEMENT CO-CHANUTE PLANT Minerals CHANUTE, KS | CHANUTE, KS | 1.3M |
| ASH GROVE CEMENT COMPANY Minerals MIDLOTHIAN, TX | MIDLOTHIAN, TX | 642K |
| ASH GROVE CEMENT COMPANY-Louisville Minerals LOUISVILLE, NE | LOUISVILLE, NE | 612K |
| ASH GROVE CEMENT COMPANY-DURKEE Minerals DURKEE, OR | DURKEE, OR | 580K |
| Ash Grove Cement Company-LEAMINGTON Minerals Nephi, UT | Nephi, UT | 549K |
| SUWANNEE AMERICAN CEMENT Minerals BRANFORD, FL | BRANFORD, FL | 361K |
| ASH GROVE CEMENT COMPANY-MONTANA CITY Minerals CLANCY, MT | CLANCY, MT | 324K |
Where Crh Americas's reported CO₂e sits by state
29.8% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Kansas (1 site) ; next is Texas at 14.7% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Crh Americas reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (4.4M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (4.4M MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (7 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (624K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Crh Americas's emissions profile
- Crh Americas runs high-intensity per facility (624K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Minerals sector on the Minerals industry page.
- It ranks #122 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Minerals emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.