EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Minerals

Hbm Holdings - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 4 facilities across 3 states (3.4M MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
3.4M
Reporting facilities
4
States covered
3
Overall rank
#148
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

3.4M MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Hbm Holdings reported 3.4M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 4 facilities in 3 states (ranks among the top 10% of U.S. corporate GHG emitters (#148 of 2,289)) Emissions remained broadly stable over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #148 of 2,289
  • #14 in Minerals
  • +2.0% since 2011

Hbm Holdings vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

3,447,945 148th of 2289 higher than 2,141 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Hbm Holdings spreads its footprint vs Minerals peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 20 Minerals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 3.71M MT).

Median split: 5 facilities, 3.71M MT CO₂e among Minerals peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 20 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 051015 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Minerals
Median split: 5 facilities, 3.71M MT CO₂e among Minerals peers.

You are here: Hbm Holdings.

Minerals peer footprint table: Hbm Holdings, 4 facilities, 3.45M MT CO2e. Holcim Participations (us), 12 facilities, 11.04M MT CO2e. Eagle Materials, 13 facilities, 5.84M MT CO2e. Rc Lonestar, 7 facilities, 5.59M MT CO2e. Lhoist North America, 10 facilities, 5.45M MT CO2e. Cemex, 7 facilities, 5.39M MT CO2e. Crh Americas, 7 facilities, 4.37M MT CO2e. Heidelberg Materials US Cement, 6 facilities, 4.17M MT CO2e. Carmeuse Lime, 10 facilities, 4.13M MT CO2e. Martin Marietta Materials, 4 facilities, 4M MT CO2e. Graymont, 9 facilities, 3.71M MT CO2e. Taiheiyo Cement USA, 4 facilities, 3.57M MT CO2e. Argos USA, 4 facilities, 3.33M MT CO2e. Gcc of America, 5 facilities, 2.29M MT CO2e. Titan America, 2 facilities, 1.85M MT CO2e. Genesis Energy, 1 facilities, 1.82M MT CO2e. American Crystal Sugar, 5 facilities, 1.8M MT CO2e. National Cement CO, 2 facilities, 1.58M MT CO2e. Tata Chemicals Soda Ash Partners, 1 facilities, 1.54M MT CO2e. Votorantim Cimentos North America, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent hbm-holdings · 2023 #148 · 3.4M MT

CO2E-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-MINERALS · TREND-FLAT · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MID 3.4M MT
  • TOP-DECILE #148/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Cvr Energy · Chemicals
  • FAC-PAIR 4 facilities
  • SPAN-PAIR 3 states
  • SECTOR-MINERALS Minerals
  • TREND-FLAT +2% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Cvr Energy · Chemicals (±1K MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.8% of 3.4M MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.2%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.8%
3.4M MT
CH₄
0.1%
3K MT
N₂O
0.2%
5K MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Hbm Holdings

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MBlack Hills · Power Plants ·…3.5MSandy Creek Energy As… · Pow…3.5MCvr Energy · Chemicals · near3.4MHbm Holdings · Minerals · th…3.4MDelaware City Refinin… · Pet…3.4MPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Hbm Holdings · May 2026

Largest sites in a top-third parent book

Hbm Holdings - top sites (MT CO₂e)

MISSISSIPPI LIME COMPANY2.5MMISSISSIPPI LIME CO - CALERA…464KMISSISSIPPI LIME CO - VERONA…323KMississippi Lime Company - B…136K

Hbm Holdings's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

High-emitter reporting timeline

Hbm Holdings - high-emitter annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
3.4M MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
3.2M3.3M3.4M3.5M3.6M 2011201320152017201920212023 3.45M

Hbm Holdings annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Hbm Holdings reported 3.4M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 3.4M MT in 2011 - a rise of 2.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Multi-site facilities (4)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
MISSISSIPPI LIME COMPANY
Minerals
STE. GENEVIEVE, MO
2.5M
MISSISSIPPI LIME CO - CALERA PLANT
Minerals
CALERA, AL
464K
MISSISSIPPI LIME CO - VERONA PLANT
Minerals
VERONA, KY
323K
Mississippi Lime Company - Bonne Terre
Minerals
Bonne Terre, MO
136K

Where Hbm Holdings's reported CO₂e sits by state

77.2% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Missouri (2 sites) ; next is Alabama at 13.4% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.

MO2.7MAL464KKY323K
EPA GHGRP · Hbm Holdings facility CO₂e by state · May 2026

Hbm Holdings reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (3.4M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Hbm Holdings's emissions profile

  • Hbm Holdings runs high-intensity per facility (862K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Minerals sector on the Minerals industry page.
  • It ranks #148 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Minerals emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.