EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Minerals

Hollingsworth & Vose - per-facility CO₂e intensity

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 2 reporting facilities in 2 states.

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
59K
Reporting facilities
2
States covered
2
Overall rank
#1433
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

59K MT CO₂e · 2023

Hollingsworth & Vose averages 29K MT CO₂e per reporting facility (low-intensity NTILE) on 59K MT total in 2023.

  • Overall rank #1433 of 2,289
  • #84 in Minerals
  • +45.1% since 2011

Hollingsworth & Vose vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

58,526 1433rd of 2289 higher than 856 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Hollingsworth & Vose spreads its footprint vs Minerals peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Minerals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 3.57M MT).

Median split: 5 facilities, 3.57M MT CO₂e among Minerals peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 051015 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Minerals
Median split: 5 facilities, 3.57M MT CO₂e among Minerals peers.

You are here: Hollingsworth & Vose.

Minerals peer footprint table: Hollingsworth & Vose, 2 facilities, 0.06M MT CO2e. Holcim Participations (us), 12 facilities, 11.04M MT CO2e. Eagle Materials, 13 facilities, 5.84M MT CO2e. Rc Lonestar, 7 facilities, 5.59M MT CO2e. Lhoist North America, 10 facilities, 5.45M MT CO2e. Cemex, 7 facilities, 5.39M MT CO2e. Crh Americas, 7 facilities, 4.37M MT CO2e. Heidelberg Materials US Cement, 6 facilities, 4.17M MT CO2e. Carmeuse Lime, 10 facilities, 4.13M MT CO2e. Martin Marietta Materials, 4 facilities, 4M MT CO2e. Graymont, 9 facilities, 3.71M MT CO2e. Taiheiyo Cement USA, 4 facilities, 3.57M MT CO2e. Hbm Holdings, 4 facilities, 3.45M MT CO2e. Argos USA, 4 facilities, 3.33M MT CO2e. Gcc of America, 5 facilities, 2.29M MT CO2e. Titan America, 2 facilities, 1.85M MT CO2e. Genesis Energy, 1 facilities, 1.82M MT CO2e. American Crystal Sugar, 5 facilities, 1.8M MT CO2e. National Cement CO, 2 facilities, 1.58M MT CO2e. Tata Chemicals Soda Ash Partners, 1 facilities, 1.54M MT CO2e. Votorantim Cimentos North America, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent hollingsworth-vose · 2023 #1433 · 59K MT

CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-MINERALS · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 59K MT
  • MID-PACK #1433/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Grizzly Energy · Petroleum and…
  • FAC-PAIR 2 facilities
  • SPAN-PAIR 2 states
  • SECTOR-MINERALS Minerals
  • TREND-SURGE +45% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Grizzly Energy · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems (±1 MT)

Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 59K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
58K MT
CH₄
0%
27 MT
N₂O
0.1%
32 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Hollingsworth & Vose

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MCounty of Shasta Cali… · Was…59KHormel Foods · Other · near59KHollingsworth & Vose · Miner…59KGrizzly Energy · Petroleum a…59KTwin Rivers Paper CO · Pulp …58KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Hollingsworth & Vose · May 2026

Largest facilities by reported emissions

Hollingsworth & Vose - top facilities (MT CO₂e)

Hollingsworth & Vose Fiber C…34KHollingsworth & Vose25K

Hollingsworth & Vose's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Emissions growth across reporting years

Hollingsworth & Vose - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
59K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.02M0.03M0.04M0.05M0.06M0.07M0.08M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.06M

Hollingsworth & Vose annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Hollingsworth & Vose reported 59K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 40K MT in 2011 - a rise of 45.1% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (2)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Hollingsworth & Vose Fiber Company
Minerals
Corvallis, OR
34K
Hollingsworth & Vose
Minerals
Hawkinsville, GA
25K

Where Hollingsworth & Vose's reported CO₂e sits by state

57.8% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Oregon (1 site) ; next is Georgia at 42.2% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.

OR34KGA25K
EPA GHGRP · Hollingsworth & Vose facility CO₂e by state · May 2026

Hollingsworth & Vose reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles

Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Hollingsworth & Vose. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Minerals browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Hollingsworth & Vose's emissions profile

  • Hollingsworth & Vose runs low-intensity per facility (29K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Minerals sector on the Minerals industry page.
  • It ranks #1433 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Minerals emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.