EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Minerals
James Hardie Industries Public LTD - per-facility CO₂e intensity
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 4 reporting facilities in 4 states.
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 139K
- Reporting facilities
- 4
- States covered
- 4
- Overall rank
- #894
Data updated May 2026
James Hardie Industries Public LTD averages 35K MT CO₂e per reporting facility (low-intensity NTILE) on 139K MT total in 2023.
- Overall rank #894 of 2,289
- #69 in Minerals
- +438.8% since 2011
James Hardie Industries Public LTD vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
138,602 894th of 2289 higher than 1,395 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How James Hardie Industries Public LTD spreads its footprint vs Minerals peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Minerals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 3.57M MT).
You are here: James Hardie Industries Public LTD.
Minerals peer footprint table: James Hardie Industries Public LTD, 4 facilities, 0.14M MT CO2e. Holcim Participations (us), 12 facilities, 11.04M MT CO2e. Eagle Materials, 13 facilities, 5.84M MT CO2e. Rc Lonestar, 7 facilities, 5.59M MT CO2e. Lhoist North America, 10 facilities, 5.45M MT CO2e. Cemex, 7 facilities, 5.39M MT CO2e. Crh Americas, 7 facilities, 4.37M MT CO2e. Heidelberg Materials US Cement, 6 facilities, 4.17M MT CO2e. Carmeuse Lime, 10 facilities, 4.13M MT CO2e. Martin Marietta Materials, 4 facilities, 4M MT CO2e. Graymont, 9 facilities, 3.71M MT CO2e. Taiheiyo Cement USA, 4 facilities, 3.57M MT CO2e. Hbm Holdings, 4 facilities, 3.45M MT CO2e. Argos USA, 4 facilities, 3.33M MT CO2e. Gcc of America, 5 facilities, 2.29M MT CO2e. Titan America, 2 facilities, 1.85M MT CO2e. Genesis Energy, 1 facilities, 1.82M MT CO2e. American Crystal Sugar, 5 facilities, 1.8M MT CO2e. National Cement CO, 2 facilities, 1.58M MT CO2e. Tata Chemicals Soda Ash Partners, 1 facilities, 1.54M MT CO2e. Votorantim Cimentos North America, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent james-hardie-industries-public-ltd · 2023 #894 · 139K MT
CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-MULTI · SECTOR-MINERALS · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 139K MT
- MID-PACK #894/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Itafos Conda · Chemicals
- FAC-PAIR 4 facilities
- SPAN-MULTI 4 states
- SECTOR-MINERALS Minerals
- TREND-SURGE +439% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Itafos Conda · Chemicals (±23 MT)
Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 139K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 138K MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 65 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 78 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around James Hardie Industries Public LTD
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest facilities by reported emissions
James Hardie Industries Public LTD - top facilities (MT CO₂e)
James Hardie Industries Public LTD's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
James Hardie Industries Public LTD - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 139K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
James Hardie Industries Public LTD annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
James Hardie Industries Public LTD reported 139K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 26K MT in 2011 - a rise of 438.8% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (4)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| JAMES HARDIE BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. (CLEB) Minerals CLEBURNE, TX | CLEBURNE, TX | 42K |
| JAMES HARDIE BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. (PERU) Minerals PERU, IL | PERU, IL | 40K |
| James Hardie Building Products Minerals Plant City, FL | Plant City, FL | 29K |
| James Hardie Building Products, Inc. Minerals Pulaski, VA | Pulaski, VA | 27K |
Where James Hardie Industries Public LTD's reported CO₂e sits by state
30.6% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Texas (1 site) ; next is Illinois at 28.6% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
James Hardie Industries Public LTD reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles
Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for James Hardie Industries Public LTD. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Minerals browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (139K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (4 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (35K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using James Hardie Industries Public LTD's emissions profile
- James Hardie Industries Public LTD runs low-intensity per facility (35K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Minerals sector on the Minerals industry page.
- It ranks #894 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Minerals emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.