EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Other
Jm Huber - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 4 facilities across 4 states (270K MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 270K
- Reporting facilities
- 4
- States covered
- 4
- Overall rank
- #642
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Jm Huber reported 270K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 4 facilities in 4 states (ranks #642 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 40% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #642 of 2,289
- #80 in Other
- +40.4% since 2011
Jm Huber vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
269,628 642nd of 2289 higher than 1,647 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Jm Huber spreads its footprint vs Other peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Other companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 2.28M MT).
You are here: Jm Huber.
Other peer footprint table: Jm Huber, 4 facilities, 0.27M MT CO2e. Prairie State Energy Campus Management, 1 facilities, 11.46M MT CO2e. Marathon Petroleum, 4 facilities, 7.11M MT CO2e. Archer Daniels Midland, 15 facilities, 6.67M MT CO2e. Consol Energy, 4 facilities, 6.53M MT CO2e. American Consolidated Natural Resources, 6 facilities, 6.29M MT CO2e. Hummel Station, 1 facilities, 2.91M MT CO2e. Arch Resources, 5 facilities, 2.83M MT CO2e. US Government, 51 facilities, 2.78M MT CO2e. Poet, 28 facilities, 2.66M MT CO2e. Cargill, 27 facilities, 2.51M MT CO2e. Alliance Holdings Gp, 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO2e. Valero Energy, 12 facilities, 2.24M MT CO2e. Tyson Foods, 31 facilities, 1.72M MT CO2e. Iron Senergy Holding, 1 facilities, 1.64M MT CO2e. Karnavati Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. Hatfield Metallurgical Intermediate Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.38M MT CO2e. Alpha Metallurgical Resources, 9 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e. Hallador Energy, 2 facilities, 1.32M MT CO2e. Green Plains, 11 facilities, 1.3M MT CO2e. Coronado Group, 3 facilities, 1.28M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent jm-huber · 2023 #642 · 270K MT
CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-MULTI · SECTOR-OTHER · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 270K MT
- MID-PACK #642/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Biourja · Other
- FAC-PAIR 4 facilities
- SPAN-MULTI 4 states
- SECTOR-OTHER Other
- TREND-SURGE +40% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Biourja · Other (±215 MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 270K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 269K MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 130 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 158 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Jm Huber
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Jm Huber - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Jm Huber's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Jm Huber - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 270K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Jm Huber annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Jm Huber reported 270K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 192K MT in 2011 - a rise of 40.4% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (4)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| KELCO Other SAN DIEGO, CA | SAN DIEGO, CA | 116K |
| CP KELCO US, INC.-OKMULGEE Other OKMULGEE, OK | OKMULGEE, OK | 70K |
| Natural Soda Other Rifle, CO | Rifle, CO | 50K |
| Huber Specialty Hydrates Metals Benton, AR | Benton, AR | 33K |
Where Jm Huber's reported CO₂e sits by state
43.2% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in California (1 site) ; next is Oklahoma at 26.1% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Jm Huber reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Jm Huber's reported CO₂e by EPA sector
Top sector Other is 87.6% of this parent's facility CO₂e (3 sites) ; Metals follows at 12.4% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.
Jm Huber reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (270K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (270K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (4 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (67K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Jm Huber's emissions profile
- Jm Huber runs mid-intensity per facility (67K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Other sector on the Other industry page.
- It ranks #642 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Other emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.