EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Waste

Lake County - lower-footprint GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), a smaller reporting parent: 14K MT CO₂e from 1 site in 1 state (2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
14K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#2171
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

14K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Lake County reported 14K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #2,171 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 67% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #2171 of 2,289
  • #535 in Waste
  • -66.6% since 2011

Lake County vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

13,748 2171st of 2289 higher than 118 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Lake County spreads its footprint vs Waste peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Waste companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 0.7M MT).

Median split: 5 facilities, 0.7M MT CO₂e among Waste peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 050100150200250 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Waste
Median split: 5 facilities, 0.7M MT CO₂e among Waste peers.

You are here: Lake County.

Waste peer footprint table: Lake County, 1 facilities, 0.01M MT CO2e. Waste Management, 225 facilities, 11.65M MT CO2e. Republic Services, 177 facilities, 10.72M MT CO2e. Covanta Holding, 22 facilities, 4.2M MT CO2e. Waste Connections US, 40 facilities, 3.63M MT CO2e. Gfl Environmental Holdings (us), 30 facilities, 2.45M MT CO2e. Wheelabrator Technologies Holdings, 12 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. Rumpke Consolidated Cos, 9 facilities, 1.69M MT CO2e. County of Orange California, 5 facilities, 1.13M MT CO2e. County of Lycoming Pennsylvania, 1 facilities, 0.9M MT CO2e. County of Pinellas Florida, 2 facilities, 0.77M MT CO2e. Apex Environmental, 1 facilities, 0.7M MT CO2e. County of Brevard Florida, 1 facilities, 0.67M MT CO2e. City of El Paso Texas, 2 facilities, 0.54M MT CO2e. Waste Connections, 8 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. City of Baton Rouge Louisiana, 2 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County Florida, 3 facilities, 0.5M MT CO2e. City of Dallas Texas, 1 facilities, 0.48M MT CO2e. Casella Waste Systems, 9 facilities, 0.46M MT CO2e. County of Polk Florida, 1 facilities, 0.43M MT CO2e. US Government, 9 facilities, 0.42M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent lake-county · 2023 #2171 · 14K MT

CO2E-THIN · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-WASTE · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 14K MT
  • BOTTOM-DECILE #2171/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH City of Bristol Va · Waste
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-WASTE Waste
  • TREND-CUT −67% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: City of Bristol Va · Waste (±13 MT)

Lower-footprint parent stamps from this GHGRP rollup, comparative context only, not a compliance rating.

2023 methane-weighted parent mix

Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Lake County: CH₄ is 100% of 14K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 100%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
-
n/r
CH₄
100%
14K MT
N₂O
-
n/r

CO₂e neighbourhood around Lake County

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MRockingham County Vir… · Was…14KBinderholz Live Oak · Other …14KLake County · Waste · this p…14KCity of Bristol Va · Waste ·…14KHoward University (in… · Oth…14KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Lake County · May 2026

Emissions decline across reporting years

Lake County - declining annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
14K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0M0.01M0.02M0.03M0.04M0.05M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.01M

Lake County annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Lake County reported 14K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 41K MT in 2011 - a decline of 66.6% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Eastlake Sanitary Landfill
Waste
Clearlake, CA
14K

Nationwide peers for a lower-footprint parent

Comparison paths for a smaller GHGRP parent: nearest CO₂e totals, similar facility counts, and intensity neighbors beyond Waste browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Lake County's emissions profile

  • Lake County runs low-intensity per facility (14K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Waste sector on the Waste industry page.
  • It ranks #2171 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Waste emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.