EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants

Reenergy Black River - lower-footprint GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), a smaller reporting parent: 14K MT CO₂e from 1 site in 1 state (2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
14K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#2174
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

14K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Reenergy Black River reported 14K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #2,174 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 13789% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #2174 of 2,289
  • #427 in Power Plants
  • +13789.1% since 2011

Reenergy Black River vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

13,625 2174th of 2289 higher than 115 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Reenergy Black River spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).

Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 01020304050 0M20M40M60M80M100M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Power Plants
Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers.

You are here: Reenergy Black River.

Power Plants peer footprint table: Reenergy Black River, 1 facilities, 0.01M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent reenergy-black-river · 2023 #2174 · 14K MT

CO2E-THIN · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 14K MT
  • BOTTOM-DECILE #2174/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Howard University (in… · Other
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
  • TREND-SURGE +13789% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Howard University (inc) · Other (±37 MT)

Lower-footprint parent stamps from this GHGRP rollup, comparative context only, not a compliance rating.

2023 nitrous-weighted parent mix

Nitrous oxide leads the non-CO₂ share: N₂O is 10.8% of 14K MT CO₂e in 2023 (CH₄ 1.9%). Non-CO₂ gases total 12.7%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
87.3%
12K MT
CH₄
1.9%
254 MT
N₂O
10.8%
1K MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Reenergy Black River

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MLake County · Waste · near14KCity of Bristol Va · Waste ·…14KHoward University (in… · Oth…14KReenergy Black River · Power…14KFarbest Foods · Other · near14KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Reenergy Black River · May 2026

Emissions growth across reporting years

Reenergy Black River - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
14K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0M0.02M0.04M0.06M0.08M0.1M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.01M

Reenergy Black River annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Reenergy Black River reported 14K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 98 MT in 2011 - a rise of 13789.1% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
ReEnergy Black River LLC
Power Plants
FORT DRUM, NY
14K

Nationwide peers for a lower-footprint parent

Comparison paths for a smaller GHGRP parent: nearest CO₂e totals, similar facility counts, and intensity neighbors beyond Power Plants browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Reenergy Black River's emissions profile

  • Reenergy Black River runs low-intensity per facility (14K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
  • It ranks #2174 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.