EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
M6 Midstream - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 14 facilities across 1 state (1.1M MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 1.1M
- Reporting facilities
- 14
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #315
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, M6 Midstream reported 1.1M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 14 facilities in 1 state (ranks #315 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 301% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #315 of 2,289
- #22 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- +300.7% since 2011
M6 Midstream vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
1,126,847 315th of 2289 higher than 1,974 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How M6 Midstream spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).
You are here: M6 Midstream.
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: M6 Midstream, 14 facilities, 1.13M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent m6-midstream · 2023 #315 · 1.1M MT
CO2E-MID · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-MULTI · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MID 1.1M MT
- UPPER-Q #315/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Holcim Participations… · Minerals
- FAC-MULTI 14 facilities
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
- TREND-SURGE +301% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Holcim Participations (us) INC - Ravena Plant · Minerals (±6K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 methane-weighted parent mix
Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for M6 Midstream: CH₄ is 12.5% of 1.1M MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 12.5%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 87.5%
- 986K MT
- CH₄
- 12.5%
- 141K MT
- N₂O
- 0%
- 308 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around M6 Midstream
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
M6 Midstream - top sites (MT CO₂e)
M6 Midstream's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
M6 Midstream - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 1.1M MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
M6 Midstream annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
M6 Midstream reported 1.1M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 281K MT in 2011 - a rise of 300.7% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Wide facility book (14)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Horseshoe Treater Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems San Augustine, TX | San Augustine, TX | 284K |
| GRAPELAND PLANT Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems GRAPELAND, TX | GRAPELAND, TX | 143K |
| Angelina Gas Plant Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Houston, TX | Houston, TX | 142K |
| Shelby Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Neuville, TX | Neuville, TX | 111K |
| HENDERSON GAS PLANT Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems HENDERSON, TX | HENDERSON, TX | 80K |
| BECKVILLE GAS PROCESSING PLANT Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems BECKVILLE, TX | BECKVILLE, TX | 76K |
| TRINIDAD GAS PROCESSING PLANT Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems TRINIDAD, TX | TRINIDAD, TX | 66K |
| LONGVIEW GAS PLANT Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Longview, TX | Longview, TX | 66K |
| AKER PLANT Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems STREETMAN, TX | STREETMAN, TX | 40K |
| Tenaha Plant Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Gary, TX | Gary, TX | 29K |
| NGPL Interconnect Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Garrison, TX | Garrison, TX | 28K |
| AVINGER GAS PLANT Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Avinger, TX | Avinger, TX | 28K |
| Tuco Gas Plant Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Houston, TX | Houston, TX | 17K |
| Zider Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Aiken, TX | Aiken, TX | 17K |
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (1.1M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (1.1M MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (14 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (80K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using M6 Midstream's emissions profile
- M6 Midstream runs mid-intensity per facility (80K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
- It ranks #315 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.