EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Other

Mead Johnson & CO - lower-footprint GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), a smaller reporting parent: 24K MT CO₂e from 1 site in 1 state (2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
24K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#2036
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

24K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Mead Johnson & CO reported 24K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #2,036 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 5% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #2036 of 2,289
  • #522 in Other
  • -5.1% since 2019

Mead Johnson & CO vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

23,910 2036th of 2289 higher than 253 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Mead Johnson & CO spreads its footprint vs Other peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Other companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 2.28M MT).

Median split: 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO₂e among Other peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 0204060 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Other
Median split: 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO₂e among Other peers.

You are here: Mead Johnson & CO.

Other peer footprint table: Mead Johnson & CO, 1 facilities, 0.02M MT CO2e. Prairie State Energy Campus Management, 1 facilities, 11.46M MT CO2e. Marathon Petroleum, 4 facilities, 7.11M MT CO2e. Archer Daniels Midland, 15 facilities, 6.67M MT CO2e. Consol Energy, 4 facilities, 6.53M MT CO2e. American Consolidated Natural Resources, 6 facilities, 6.29M MT CO2e. Hummel Station, 1 facilities, 2.91M MT CO2e. Arch Resources, 5 facilities, 2.83M MT CO2e. US Government, 51 facilities, 2.78M MT CO2e. Poet, 28 facilities, 2.66M MT CO2e. Cargill, 27 facilities, 2.51M MT CO2e. Alliance Holdings Gp, 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO2e. Valero Energy, 12 facilities, 2.24M MT CO2e. Tyson Foods, 31 facilities, 1.72M MT CO2e. Iron Senergy Holding, 1 facilities, 1.64M MT CO2e. Karnavati Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. Hatfield Metallurgical Intermediate Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.38M MT CO2e. Alpha Metallurgical Resources, 9 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e. Hallador Energy, 2 facilities, 1.32M MT CO2e. Green Plains, 11 facilities, 1.3M MT CO2e. Coronado Group, 3 facilities, 1.28M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent mead-johnson-co · 2023 #2036 · 24K MT

CO2E-THIN · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-OTHER · TREND-DOWN · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 24K MT
  • LOWER-Q #2036/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH O'brien Industrial Ho… · Other
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-OTHER Other
  • TREND-DOWN −5% since 2019
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: O'brien Industrial Holding · Other (±13 MT)

Lower-footprint parent stamps from this GHGRP rollup, comparative context only, not a compliance rating.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 24K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
24K MT
CH₄
0%
11 MT
N₂O
0.1%
13 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Mead Johnson & CO

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MNorthern Light Health · Othe…24KLos Angeles General M… · Oth…24KO'brien Industrial Ho… · Oth…24KMead Johnson & CO · Other · …24KCity of Pasadena Cali… · Pow…24KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Mead Johnson & CO · May 2026

Reported emissions over time

Mead Johnson & CO - annual reported GHG emissions

EPA GHGRP 2019–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
24K MT
5 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.02M0.02M0.03M0.03M0.04M 20192020202120222023 0.02M

Mead Johnson & CO annual reported GHG emissions, 2019–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Mead Johnson & CO reported 24K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 25K MT in 2019 - a decline of 5.1% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Mead Johnson Nutrition
Other
Zeeland, MI
24K

Nationwide peers for a lower-footprint parent

Comparison paths for a smaller GHGRP parent: nearest CO₂e totals, similar facility counts, and intensity neighbors beyond Other browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Mead Johnson & CO's emissions profile

  • Mead Johnson & CO runs low-intensity per facility (24K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Other sector on the Other industry page.
  • It ranks #2036 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Other emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.