Facility ID: 1013538 · Other

Mead Johnson Nutrition

Verify with EPA →

Zeeland, MI · OTTAWA COUNTY · NAICS 311514

Data updated May 2026

24K MT CO₂e · 2023

Mead Johnson Nutrition ranks among smaller GHGRP totals (#6,350 of 8,713 nationally; #184 of 260 in MI), a lower-footprint comparator in Other.

  • National rank #6,350 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
  • #184 of 260 in MI
  • #1,162 of 1,599 in Other
  • 100% of MEAD JOHNSON & CO parent CO₂e
  • 2023 mix: 0.1% non-CO₂ (N₂O-led)
  • -5.1% since 2019

Mead Johnson Nutrition vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities

Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility

23,910 6350th of 8713 higher than 2,363 of 8,713 facilities

GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

Facility footprint context

This site accounts for 100% of MEAD JOHNSON & CO reported parent CO₂e (24K MT of 24K MT ). Inside the EPA Other sector it ranks #1,162 of 1,599 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.

2023 gas mix desk

Of 24K MT CO₂e reported for 2023, non-CO₂ gases are 0.1% , led by N₂O at 0.1% . Component shares use this facility's GHGRP CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year (already CO₂e-weighted).

CO₂
99.9%
24K MT
CH₄
0%
11 MT
N₂O
0.1%
13 MT

Annual emissions history

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Year Total CO2e (MT)
2023 23,910
2022 24,517
2021 23,429
2020 25,728
2019 25,208

Facility insight: Mead Johnson Nutrition

Mead Johnson Nutrition (ID 1013538) reported 24K MT CO₂e for 2023 in OTTAWA COUNTY, MI (#6,350 of 8,713 by latest CO₂e).

Over 5 years (2019–2023), emissions stayed within a narrow band around 24K MT CO₂e (peak 26K MT). This facility has filed every year from 2019 to 2023, a complete 5-year record.

Peak year was 2020 at 26K MT CO2e; latest 2023 sits 7.1% below that peak (24K MT). The largest year-to-year move was 2020→2021 (-8.9%, 2K MT).

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does Mead Johnson Nutrition rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities?

According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, Mead Johnson Nutrition ranks #6,350 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #184 of 260 facilities in MI (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.

What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than Mead Johnson Nutrition?

Mead Johnson Nutrition's 24K MT CO₂e is higher than 2,363 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (27%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.

How much CO2 does Mead Johnson Nutrition emit?

Mead Johnson Nutrition reported 24K MT CO2e in 2023.

What share of MEAD JOHNSON & CO does Mead Johnson Nutrition represent?

Mead Johnson Nutrition accounts for 100% of MEAD JOHNSON & CO's reported GHGRP CO₂e (24K MT of 24K MT).

What is Mead Johnson Nutrition's 2023 CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O mix?

In 2023, non-CO₂ gases were 0.1% of reported CO₂e at Mead Johnson Nutrition, with N₂O the larger non-CO₂ share at 0.1% (CO₂ 99.9%). Shares use the facility's GHGRP gas components for that year.

Where does Mead Johnson Nutrition rank inside Other?

Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Other, Mead Johnson Nutrition ranks #1,162 of 1,599 by latest reported CO₂e.

Is Mead Johnson Nutrition reducing emissions?

Over 5 reporting years (2019–2023), Mead Johnson Nutrition's emissions have decreased by 5.1%. Emissions have remained relatively stable.

Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector

Lower-footprint peers outside MI: nearest CO₂e totals and same-sector reporters for context.

Data sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Facility ID 1013538. Data subject to facility self-reporting, not compliance advice. See our methodology for how this data is sourced, computed, and verified. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCarbon