EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Other
Mohawk Industries - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 7 facilities across 5 states (293K MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 293K
- Reporting facilities
- 7
- States covered
- 5
- Overall rank
- #614
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Mohawk Industries reported 293K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 7 facilities in 5 states (ranks #614 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions remained broadly stable over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #614 of 2,289
- #73 in Other
- +2.6% since 2011
Mohawk Industries vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
292,597 614th of 2289 higher than 1,675 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Mohawk Industries spreads its footprint vs Other peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Other companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 2.28M MT).
You are here: Mohawk Industries.
Other peer footprint table: Mohawk Industries, 7 facilities, 0.29M MT CO2e. Prairie State Energy Campus Management, 1 facilities, 11.46M MT CO2e. Marathon Petroleum, 4 facilities, 7.11M MT CO2e. Archer Daniels Midland, 15 facilities, 6.67M MT CO2e. Consol Energy, 4 facilities, 6.53M MT CO2e. American Consolidated Natural Resources, 6 facilities, 6.29M MT CO2e. Hummel Station, 1 facilities, 2.91M MT CO2e. Arch Resources, 5 facilities, 2.83M MT CO2e. US Government, 51 facilities, 2.78M MT CO2e. Poet, 28 facilities, 2.66M MT CO2e. Cargill, 27 facilities, 2.51M MT CO2e. Alliance Holdings Gp, 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO2e. Valero Energy, 12 facilities, 2.24M MT CO2e. Tyson Foods, 31 facilities, 1.72M MT CO2e. Iron Senergy Holding, 1 facilities, 1.64M MT CO2e. Karnavati Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. Hatfield Metallurgical Intermediate Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.38M MT CO2e. Alpha Metallurgical Resources, 9 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e. Hallador Energy, 2 facilities, 1.32M MT CO2e. Green Plains, 11 facilities, 1.3M MT CO2e. Coronado Group, 3 facilities, 1.28M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent mohawk-industries · 2023 #614 · 293K MT
CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-MULTI · SECTOR-OTHER · TREND-FLAT · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 293K MT
- MID-PACK #614/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Ada Carbon Solutions · Chemicals
- FAC-PAIR 7 facilities
- SPAN-MULTI 5 states
- SECTOR-OTHER Other
- TREND-FLAT +3% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Ada Carbon Solutions · Chemicals (±249 MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 293K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 292K MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 138 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 164 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Mohawk Industries
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Mohawk Industries - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Mohawk Industries's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
High-emitter reporting timeline
Mohawk Industries - high-emitter annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 293K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Mohawk Industries annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Mohawk Industries reported 293K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 285K MT in 2011 - a rise of 2.6% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (7)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Dal-Tile Sunnyvale Mfg Minerals SUNNYVALE, TX | SUNNYVALE, TX | 67K |
| DAL-ITALIA Minerals MUSKOGEE, OK | MUSKOGEE, OK | 62K |
| Dal-Tile Dickson Minerals Dickson, TN | Dickson, TN | 54K |
| ALADDIN MILLS - ANTIOCH RD PLA NT Other DALTON, GA | DALTON, GA | 35K |
| DAL TILE INTERNATIONAL Minerals EL PASO, TX | EL PASO, TX | 33K |
| Mohawk Industries - S. HAMILTON ST. PLANT Other DALTON, GA | DALTON, GA | 23K |
| MONARCH CERAMIC TILE INC Minerals FLORENCE, AL | FLORENCE, AL | 18K |
Where Mohawk Industries's reported CO₂e sits by state
34% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Texas (2 sites) ; next is Oklahoma at 21.3% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Mohawk Industries reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Mohawk Industries's reported CO₂e by EPA sector
Top sector Minerals is 80.1% of this parent's facility CO₂e (5 sites) ; Other follows at 19.9% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.
Mohawk Industries reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (293K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (293K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (7 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (42K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Mohawk Industries's emissions profile
- Mohawk Industries runs low-intensity per facility (42K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Other sector on the Other industry page.
- It ranks #614 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Other emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.