EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Waste
Prince George's County Department of the Environmental Resource Recovery Div - lower-footprint GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), a smaller reporting parent: 42K MT CO₂e from 1 site in 1 state (2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 42K
- Reporting facilities
- 1
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #1665
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Prince George's County Department of the Environmental Resource Recovery Div reported 42K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #1,665 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 82% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #1665 of 2,289
- #395 in Waste
- -82.2% since 2011
Prince George's County Department of the Environmental Resource Recovery Div vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
41,826 1665th of 2289 higher than 624 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Prince George's County Department of the Environmental Resource Recovery Div spreads its footprint vs Waste peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Waste companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 0.7M MT).
You are here: Prince George's County Department of the Environmental Resource Recovery Div.
Waste peer footprint table: Prince George's County Department of the Environmental Resource Recovery Div, 1 facilities, 0.04M MT CO2e. Waste Management, 225 facilities, 11.65M MT CO2e. Republic Services, 177 facilities, 10.72M MT CO2e. Covanta Holding, 22 facilities, 4.2M MT CO2e. Waste Connections US, 40 facilities, 3.63M MT CO2e. Gfl Environmental Holdings (us), 30 facilities, 2.45M MT CO2e. Wheelabrator Technologies Holdings, 12 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. Rumpke Consolidated Cos, 9 facilities, 1.69M MT CO2e. County of Orange California, 5 facilities, 1.13M MT CO2e. County of Lycoming Pennsylvania, 1 facilities, 0.9M MT CO2e. County of Pinellas Florida, 2 facilities, 0.77M MT CO2e. Apex Environmental, 1 facilities, 0.7M MT CO2e. County of Brevard Florida, 1 facilities, 0.67M MT CO2e. City of El Paso Texas, 2 facilities, 0.54M MT CO2e. Waste Connections, 8 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. City of Baton Rouge Louisiana, 2 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County Florida, 3 facilities, 0.5M MT CO2e. City of Dallas Texas, 1 facilities, 0.48M MT CO2e. Casella Waste Systems, 9 facilities, 0.46M MT CO2e. County of Polk Florida, 1 facilities, 0.43M MT CO2e. US Government, 9 facilities, 0.42M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent prince-george-s-county-department-of-the-environmental-resource-recovery-div · 2023 #1665 · 42K MT
CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-WASTE · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-THIN 42K MT
- MID-PACK #1665/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Black Hawk Mining · Other
- FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-WASTE Waste
- TREND-CUT −82% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Black Hawk Mining · Other (±1 MT)
Lower-footprint parent stamps from this GHGRP rollup, comparative context only, not a compliance rating.
2023 methane-weighted parent mix
Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Prince George's County Department: CH₄ is 99.6% of 42K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 99.6%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 0.4%
- 153 MT
- CH₄
- 99.6%
- 42K MT
- N₂O
- 0%
- 1 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Prince George's County Department
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Emissions decline across reporting years
Prince George's County Department of the Environmental Resource Recovery Div - declining annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 42K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Prince George's County Department of the Environmental Resource Recovery Div annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Prince George's County Department of the Environmental Resource Recovery Div reported 42K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 235K MT in 2011 - a decline of 82.2% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Facilities (1)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY BROWN STATION ROA Waste UPPER MARLBORO, MD | UPPER MARLBORO, MD | 42K |
Nationwide peers for a lower-footprint parent
Comparison paths for a smaller GHGRP parent: nearest CO₂e totals, similar facility counts, and intensity neighbors beyond Waste browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (42K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (1 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (42K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Prince George's County Department of the Environmental Resource Recovery Div's emissions profile
- Prince George's County Department of the Environmental Resource Recovery Div runs low-intensity per facility (42K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Waste sector on the Waste industry page.
- It ranks #1665 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Waste emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.