EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Minerals

Nippon Electric Glass America - declining reported GHG

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 2 reporting facilities in 1 state.

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
105K
Reporting facilities
2
States covered
1
Overall rank
#1034
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

105K MT CO₂e · 2023

Nippon Electric Glass America reported emissions fell 25.4% since 2011 to 105K MT CO₂e in 2023.

  • Overall rank #1034 of 2,289
  • #70 in Minerals
  • -25.4% since 2011

Nippon Electric Glass America vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

105,346 1034th of 2289 higher than 1,255 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Nippon Electric Glass America spreads its footprint vs Minerals peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Minerals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 3.57M MT).

Median split: 5 facilities, 3.57M MT CO₂e among Minerals peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 051015 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Minerals
Median split: 5 facilities, 3.57M MT CO₂e among Minerals peers.

You are here: Nippon Electric Glass America.

Minerals peer footprint table: Nippon Electric Glass America, 2 facilities, 0.11M MT CO2e. Holcim Participations (us), 12 facilities, 11.04M MT CO2e. Eagle Materials, 13 facilities, 5.84M MT CO2e. Rc Lonestar, 7 facilities, 5.59M MT CO2e. Lhoist North America, 10 facilities, 5.45M MT CO2e. Cemex, 7 facilities, 5.39M MT CO2e. Crh Americas, 7 facilities, 4.37M MT CO2e. Heidelberg Materials US Cement, 6 facilities, 4.17M MT CO2e. Carmeuse Lime, 10 facilities, 4.13M MT CO2e. Martin Marietta Materials, 4 facilities, 4M MT CO2e. Graymont, 9 facilities, 3.71M MT CO2e. Taiheiyo Cement USA, 4 facilities, 3.57M MT CO2e. Hbm Holdings, 4 facilities, 3.45M MT CO2e. Argos USA, 4 facilities, 3.33M MT CO2e. Gcc of America, 5 facilities, 2.29M MT CO2e. Titan America, 2 facilities, 1.85M MT CO2e. Genesis Energy, 1 facilities, 1.82M MT CO2e. American Crystal Sugar, 5 facilities, 1.8M MT CO2e. National Cement CO, 2 facilities, 1.58M MT CO2e. Tata Chemicals Soda Ash Partners, 1 facilities, 1.54M MT CO2e. Votorantim Cimentos North America, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent nippon-electric-glass-america · 2023 #1034 · 105K MT

CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-MINERALS · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 105K MT
  • MID-PACK #1034/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH City of Farmers Branch · Waste
  • FAC-PAIR 2 facilities
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-MINERALS Minerals
  • TREND-CUT −25% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: City of Farmers Branch · Waste (±114 MT)

Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 105K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
105K MT
CH₄
0%
42 MT
N₂O
0%
50 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Nippon Electric Glass America

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MVaquero Permian Proce… · Pet…106KNippon Electric Glass… · Min…105KCity of Farmers Branch · Was…105KSiouxland Ethanol · Other · …105KGrade 6 Oil · Petroleum a… ·…105KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Nippon Electric Glass America · May 2026

Largest facilities by reported emissions

Nippon Electric Glass America - top facilities (MT CO₂e)

ELECTRIC GLASS FIBER AMERICA…73KElectric Glass Fiber America…33K

Nippon Electric Glass America's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Emissions decline across reporting years

Nippon Electric Glass America - declining annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
105K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.06M0.08M0.1M0.12M0.14M0.16M0.18M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.11M

Nippon Electric Glass America annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Nippon Electric Glass America reported 105K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 141K MT in 2011 - a decline of 25.4% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (2)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
ELECTRIC GLASS FIBER AMERICA, LLC
Minerals
SHELBY, NC
73K
Electric Glass Fiber America, LLC
Minerals
LEXINGTON, NC
33K

Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles

Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Nippon Electric Glass America. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Minerals browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Nippon Electric Glass America's emissions profile

  • Nippon Electric Glass America runs mid-intensity per facility (53K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Minerals sector on the Minerals industry page.
  • It ranks #1034 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Minerals emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.