EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants

Oxbow Creek Energy - lower-footprint GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), a smaller reporting parent: 31K MT CO₂e from 1 site in 1 state (2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
31K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#1871
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

31K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Oxbow Creek Energy reported 31K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #1,871 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 6595% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #1871 of 2,289
  • #390 in Power Plants
  • +6594.9% since 2019

Oxbow Creek Energy vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

30,522 1871st of 2289 higher than 418 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Oxbow Creek Energy spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).

Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 01020304050 0M20M40M60M80M100M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Power Plants
Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers.

You are here: Oxbow Creek Energy.

Power Plants peer footprint table: Oxbow Creek Energy, 1 facilities, 0.03M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent oxbow-creek-energy · 2023 #1871 · 31K MT

CO2E-THIN · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 31K MT
  • LOWER-Q #1871/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Gallia County Commiss… · Waste
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
  • TREND-SURGE +6595% since 2019
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Gallia County Commissioners · Waste (±68 MT)

Lower-footprint parent stamps from this GHGRP rollup, comparative context only, not a compliance rating.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 31K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
30K MT
CH₄
0%
15 MT
N₂O
0.1%
18 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Oxbow Creek Energy

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MOxbow Creek Energy · Power P…31KGallia County Commiss… · Was…30KMitsubishi Chemical A… · Oth…30KBeaver Dam Energy · Power Pl…30KSeaside LNG · Petroleum a… ·…30KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Oxbow Creek Energy · May 2026

Emissions growth across reporting years

Oxbow Creek Energy - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2019–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
31K MT
5 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0M0.01M0.02M0.03M0.04M 20192020202120222023 0.03M

Oxbow Creek Energy annual reported GHG emissions, 2019–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Oxbow Creek Energy reported 31K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 456 MT in 2019 - a rise of 6594.9% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Oxbow Creek Energy LLC
Power Plants
Factoryville, PA
31K

Nationwide peers for a lower-footprint parent

Comparison paths for a smaller GHGRP parent: nearest CO₂e totals, similar facility counts, and intensity neighbors beyond Power Plants browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Oxbow Creek Energy's emissions profile

  • Oxbow Creek Energy runs low-intensity per facility (31K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
  • It ranks #1871 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.